What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Complaint of racial abuse in Roosters v Broncos

Maximus

Coach
Messages
12,453
This isn't how it happened. The complaint was asked for first (at the start of the melee) then once it all simmered down, Gee called captains and Mam over, confirmed that he wanted to make the complaint, put Leniu on report and said it would be reviewed, dealt with later, time to get on with the game.

Think he dealt with it pretty well. He's not there to be an investigator mid-game.

It's exactly how it happened. Mam said "he called me a monkey" twice, Gee responded "we'll deal with it later". Another player (Riki?) said "he called him a monkey" and Gee responded "let's go, we'll deal with it later". Then Mam complained again and Gee asked if Mam wanted to make a formal complaint.

There's not a lot he could do, but his "we've got a spectacle here" to the captains and Leniu afterwards suggest he didn't want to deal with it.
 

SLRBRONCOS

Referee
Messages
24,012
It's exactly how it happened. Mam said "he called me a monkey" twice, Gee responded "we'll deal with it later". Another player (Riki?) said "he called him a monkey" and Gee responded "let's go, we'll deal with it later". Then Mam complained again and Gee asked if Mam wanted to make a formal complaint.

There's not a lot he could do, but his "we've got a spectacle here" to the captains and Leniu afterwards suggest he didn't want to deal with it.
There was a third players that said "he actually called him a monkey" too. I think it was Kotoni.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,103
It's exactly how it happened. Mam said "he called me a monkey" twice, Gee responded "we'll deal with it later". Another player (Riki?) said "he called him a monkey" and Gee responded "let's go, we'll deal with it later". Then Mam complained again and Gee asked if Mam wanted to make a formal complaint.

There's not a lot he could do, but his "we've got a spectacle here" to the captains and Leniu afterwards suggest he didn't want to deal with it.
I thought he handled it perfectly.

It would be completely unprecedented for the referee to take action on field for an incident that he didn't observe or witness, based solely on a players word.

I think the angst is in him using the word "spectacle".
 
Messages
515
It's exactly how it happened. Mam said "he called me a monkey" twice, Gee responded "we'll deal with it later". Another player (Riki?) said "he called him a monkey" and Gee responded "let's go, we'll deal with it later". Then Mam complained again and Gee asked if Mam wanted to make a formal complaint.

There's not a lot he could do, but his "we've got a spectacle here" to the captains and Leniu afterwards suggest he didn't want to deal with it.

If that's how it played out... then yea, agree Gee should've pulled them together immediately to ask if Mann wanted to lay a formal complaint.

That said, Gee was in a difficult position. There's no doubt refs were, if not instructed then certainly encouraged, to do their part in delivering a spectacle, given the circumstances.

He may have erred slightly initially but he got the right outcome in the end so all things considered, he did ok IMO.
 
Messages
14,436
Not the best reaction from the ref either. ‘Let’s get on with it, we’ll deal with it later’ before asking if he wanted to make a formal complaint.

What was the referee supposed to do, convene a jury on the field? In all honesty its like someone making an accusation of biting, if none of the officials saw/hear it then they can only ask if the player wants to make a formal complaint.
 
Messages
515
How would people expect the referee to act in this scenario? (Genuine question?)
Me personally, and assuming it played out exactly as has been described...

Only thing I would expect different is he immediately pulls them together as soon as Mann makes his first accusation to ask if he wants to make a formal complaint.

That's all, everything else from that point was fine IMO.
 

Vlad59

Juniors
Messages
2,308
I’m sure the squid didn’t hear anything either.

Watching him walk over to the ref was like watching the arsonist helping the fireys.

Unlike that idiot Spencer, he denied it for weeks didn’t he?

Spencer single handedly screwed the whole NRL mission with his nasty racial “fun and games” slur.

I thought the event would have been wrecked by drunken violence, drugs, assorted crime or something sleazy.

Three witnesses, their names on the line, big international event…. I would have sent him off.
Sent him off? This just gets more ridiculous
 

no name

Coach
Messages
19,543
What was the referee supposed to do, convene a jury on the field? In all honesty it’s like someone making an accusation of biting, if none of the officials saw/hear it then they can only ask if the player wants to make a formal complaint.
I didn’t want any further action on the field. Gee’s reaction to the initial (multiple) allegations was let’s move on. Only when Broncos players continued to remonstrate was the formal complaint offered.
I didn’t say that what Gee did was terribly wrong, just that it wasn’t a great reaction, which it wasn’t imo.
 

Maximus

Coach
Messages
12,453
I thought he handled it perfectly.

It would be completely unprecedented for the referee to take action on field for an incident that he didn't observe or witness, based solely on a players word.

I think the angst is in him using the word "spectacle".

I'm not sure anyone expected any punishment then and there on the field even if he did witness it.

The biggest problem I had is he didn't even want to take the complaint until multiple other players supported Mam's accusations.
 

AlwaysGreen

Immortal
Messages
48,928
Spencer is lucky he didn't call anyone a monkey (allegedly) off the field in the US.

Wouldn't be all fun and games then.
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
46,970
I didn’t want any further action on the field. Gee’s reaction to the initial (multiple) allegations was let’s move on. Only when Broncos players continued to remonstrate was the formal complaint offered.
I didn’t say that what Gee did was terribly wrong, just that it wasn’t a great reaction, which it wasn’t imo.

Agreed. The way he handled the format report was exactly what we would want to see. Before and after was a shambles.

Trying to get them to just move on and deal with it later - incorrect. If a player makes a complaint like that, you deal with it immediately and don't tell them to worry about it later.

Then at the end, when Spencer asked what the allegation was, the referee responded with "Spencer, we've got a spectacle here, we've gotta keep the game going. It doesn't matter."

Just awful handling by Gee either side of the formal complaint. Apparently the spectacle of a game in Vegas takes precedence over correctly handling a complaint of racial abuse. Mam had every right to have his complaint taken seriously. Leniu had every right to ask what the allegation against him was. Gee tried to fob both of them off.
 
Top