Craig Field

[northwest9]

hahahahaha, classic stuff

 

[Fire]

You only have to look at Conroy's internet censorship bill to know that is the way things are headed. I think Australians by and large are lackeys or have too much of a `she'll be right' attitude in that they are far too trusting of the establishment and that the establishment has their interests at heart. The establishment has the establishments interests at heart. Do they really think the blocking of a site will stop people going there ? Has prohibition of drugs stopped drugs ?

The iiNet case is a massive blow to the federal govt and law enforcement agencies as to what happens on the net as it basically said an IP Address is a router address and basically `any bugger logged into that router coulda done it my wifi was unsecured'. So what better way to control the net than to see who is looking at what.

Let's say a party knows an internet user votes one way or another. What is to stop the govt offering incentives, or ordering ATO audits as retribution etc etc etc ?

Look at how the governments around the world got down on hands and knees to suck the collective c**ks of the film and tv studios recently with SOPA. These same studios that were charging $30 for a CD back in 1990 (let's say $50 of today's money) and ripping off the man in the street. Now the tides have turned and everything is available freely on the net and they don't like being dicked by the little man so they go to court and try and sue the little man and/or the ISPs. TPG used to send cease and desist emails but did anyone heed them ? Did they f**k.

People will get around them. VPNs, seedboxes, anonymous trackers you name it, pay for nothing, steal everything and give these turds what is coming. Actors earning 20 mill a film will be a thing of the past when you can leech it the day it is released and the studio gets nothing. Even better is Rusty might be forced to sell soufs. What's not to love about this brave new world.

The next ones to be dicked and f**ked over will be the mega media companies like News. Do you really think the NBN is so aunty dot can load smh quicker on her pentium 2 ? Seriously ?? In Singapore they are rolling out Gigabit fibre connections as we speak (and there are no download limits on their plans). Fibre of such speeds (and like we are getting with the NBN) will cripple News, Time Warner etc. Why pay for fox when some bloke who has will stream it onto the net gratis. The telecomms companies are complicit in this ultra ultra high speed fibre rollout, the only effect of which will be to destroy FTA and cable TV platforms, mark my words.

Good old Telstra are charging me $2 a month more to go from 200GB @ 30mbps to 500GB @ 100mbps. Do they think LU and smh are the reason I wanna go to that level or do they probably know i wanna leech and download as much shit in a month as humanly possible ???

Thanks for the reply. So you're saying it's all a matter of continuity and change.

 

[Hutty1986]

You only have to look at Conroy's internet censorship bill to know that is the way things are headed. I think Australians by and large are lackeys or have too much of a `she'll be right' attitude in that they are far too trusting of the establishment and that the establishment has their interests at heart. The establishment has the establishments interests at heart. Do they really think the blocking of a site will stop people going there ? Has prohibition of drugs stopped drugs ?

The iiNet case is a massive blow to the federal govt and law enforcement agencies as to what happens on the net as it basically said an IP Address is a router address and basically `any bugger logged into that router coulda done it my wifi was unsecured'. So what better way to control the net than to see who is looking at what.

Let's say a party knows an internet user votes one way or another. What is to stop the govt offering incentives, or ordering ATO audits as retribution etc etc etc ?

Look at how the governments around the world got down on hands and knees to suck the collective c**ks of the film and tv studios recently with SOPA. These same studios that were charging $30 for a CD back in 1990 (let's say $50 of today's money) and ripping off the man in the street. Now the tides have turned and everything is available freely on the net and they don't like being dicked by the little man so they go to court and try and sue the little man and/or the ISPs. TPG used to send cease and desist emails but did anyone heed them ? Did they f**k.

People will get around them. VPNs, seedboxes, anonymous trackers you name it, pay for nothing, steal everything and give these turds what is coming. Actors earning 20 mill a film will be a thing of the past when you can leech it the day it is released and the studio gets nothing. Even better is Rusty might be forced to sell soufs. What's not to love about this brave new world.

The next ones to be dicked and f**ked over will be the mega media companies like News. Do you really think the NBN is so aunty dot can load smh quicker on her pentium 2 ? Seriously ?? In Singapore they are rolling out Gigabit fibre connections as we speak (and there are no download limits on their plans). Fibre of such speeds (and like we are getting with the NBN) will cripple News, Time Warner etc. Why pay for fox when some bloke who has will stream it onto the net gratis. The telecomms companies are complicit in this ultra ultra high speed fibre rollout, the only effect of which will be to destroy FTA and cable TV platforms, mark my words.

Good old Telstra are charging me $2 a month more to go from 200GB @ 30mbps to 500GB @ 100mbps. Do they think LU and smh are the reason I wanna go to that level or do they probably know i wanna leech and download as much shit in a month as humanly possible ???

You're off ya f*ckin head

 

[Pistol_Pete]

Thanks for the reply. So you're saying it's all a matter of continuity and change.

Or that the establishment needs new ways to control the plebs. Internet censorship ticks a few boxes doesn't it.

 

[Fire]

Or that the establishment needs new ways to control the plebs. Internet censorship ticks a few boxes doesn't it.

Perhaps. What's your definition of 'the Establishment'?

 

[age.s]

The Aus internet censorship plan and SOPA were both absolute bullshit peices of legislation. Absolutely nothing wrong with calling governments out on that crap.

 

[_Johnsy]

Perhaps. What's your definition of 'the Establishment'?

The man, man.

 

[Fire]

^ Love it :lol:

 

[The.X.Factor9]

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

To think, this thread started off being about Craig Field.

 

[Fire]

Looks like CrazyTiger has picked up his footy and gone home to have a sook to Mummy. Shame. He had some good concepts to contribute to this thread.

 

[_Johnsy]

You only have to look at Conroy's internet censorship bill to know that is the way things are headed. I think Australians by and large are lackeys or have too much of a `she'll be right' attitude in that they are far too trusting of the establishment and that the establishment has their interests at heart. The establishment has the establishments interests at heart. Do they really think the blocking of a site will stop people going there ? Has prohibition of drugs stopped drugs ?

The iiNet case is a massive blow to the federal govt and law enforcement agencies as to what happens on the net as it basically said an IP Address is a router address and basically `any bugger logged into that router coulda done it my wifi was unsecured'. So what better way to control the net than to see who is looking at what.

Let's say a party knows an internet user votes one way or another. What is to stop the govt offering incentives, or ordering ATO audits as retribution etc etc etc ?

Look at how the governments around the world got down on hands and knees to suck the collective c**ks of the film and tv studios recently with SOPA. These same studios that were charging $30 for a CD back in 1990 (let's say $50 of today's money) and ripping off the man in the street. Now the tides have turned and everything is available freely on the net and they don't like being dicked by the little man so they go to court and try and sue the little man and/or the ISPs. TPG used to send cease and desist emails but did anyone heed them ? Did they f**k.

People will get around them. VPNs, seedboxes, anonymous trackers you name it, pay for nothing, steal everything and give these turds what is coming. Actors earning 20 mill a film will be a thing of the past when you can leech it the day it is released and the studio gets nothing. Even better is Rusty might be forced to sell soufs. What's not to love about this brave new world.

The next ones to be dicked and f**ked over will be the mega media companies like News. Do you really think the NBN is so aunty dot can load smh quicker on her pentium 2 ? Seriously ?? In Singapore they are rolling out Gigabit fibre connections as we speak (and there are no download limits on their plans). Fibre of such speeds (and like we are getting with the NBN) will cripple News, Time Warner etc. Why pay for fox when some bloke who has will stream it onto the net gratis. The telecomms companies are complicit in this ultra ultra high speed fibre rollout, the only effect of which will be to destroy FTA and cable TV platforms, mark my words.

Good old Telstra are charging me $2 a month more to go from 200GB @ 30mbps to 500GB @ 100mbps. Do they think LU and smh are the reason I wanna go to that level or do they probably know i wanna leech and download as much shit in a month as humanly possible ???

Or that the establishment needs new ways to control the plebs. Internet censorship ticks a few boxes doesn't it.

It was only a few posts ago you were whinging about not sticking to the topic, yet here you are winding yourself up again. FMD you need professional help.

 

[_Johnsy]

Maybe Crazy Tiger is telling the truth.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-493400/How-police-officers-cram-squad-car-Answer--14.html

It sounds like the start of a joke - how many police officers can you fit into a Volkswagen?
The answer, apparently, is 14 ... but it'll be a squeeze.
This extraordinary sight is the result of Metropolitan officers' desire to get as quickly as possible to the scene of Monday's warehouse fire at the Olympic site in London.

The Volkswagen van is designed to carry eight passengers, but onlookers were amazed to see it driving through Tower Hamlets with an extra six bodies on board.
There certainly weren't enough seatbelts to go round, as at least one officer could be seen pressed uncomfortably against the back window.
And after their traffic department colleagues see these photographs, those PCs who found it was standing room only could be given a £500 fine for not belting up.
The driver could also be fined up to £5,000 for allowing the minibus to be overloaded.
Carrying too many passengers is dangerous because it can make the vehicle less stable. It would also be harder to steer and take longer to stop.
A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said the policemen involved would be reprimanded.
'Officers from Tower Hamlets were asked to assist colleagues at the Olympic site during the recent fire,' he said. 'During the early stages of the incident it was necessary to ensure the response was quick.
'The officers concerned will be spoken to regarding the incident.'
Firemen believe the blaze in Stratford could have been started by welders demolishing a building.

 

[Knownothing]

It's pretty pathetic the way that this thread has degenerated.


One punch can kill. There have been a couple of examples in the last week.


Idiots who condone, or even promote, violence, on or off the field, should hang their heads in shame.

Bring back the biff really grates with me, when we see incidents like this. One punch can kill. It is a pretty easy train of thought to understand, isn't it?

 

[andyman9999]

You only have to look at Conroy's internet censorship bill to know that is the way things are headed. I think Australians by and large are lackeys or have too much of a `she'll be right' attitude in that they are far too trusting of the establishment and that the establishment has their interests at heart. The establishment has the establishments interests at heart. Do they really think the blocking of a site will stop people going there ? Has prohibition of drugs stopped drugs ?

The iiNet case is a massive blow to the federal govt and law enforcement agencies as to what happens on the net as it basically said an IP Address is a router address and basically `any bugger logged into that router coulda done it my wifi was unsecured'. So what better way to control the net than to see who is looking at what.

Let's say a party knows an internet user votes one way or another. What is to stop the govt offering incentives, or ordering ATO audits as retribution etc etc etc ?

Look at how the governments around the world got down on hands and knees to suck the collective c**ks of the film and tv studios recently with SOPA. These same studios that were charging $30 for a CD back in 1990 (let's say $50 of today's money) and ripping off the man in the street. Now the tides have turned and everything is available freely on the net and they don't like being dicked by the little man so they go to court and try and sue the little man and/or the ISPs. TPG used to send cease and desist emails but did anyone heed them ? Did they f**k.

People will get around them. VPNs, seedboxes, anonymous trackers you name it, pay for nothing, steal everything and give these turds what is coming. Actors earning 20 mill a film will be a thing of the past when you can leech it the day it is released and the studio gets nothing. Even better is Rusty might be forced to sell soufs. What's not to love about this brave new world.

The next ones to be dicked and f**ked over will be the mega media companies like News. Do you really think the NBN is so aunty dot can load smh quicker on her pentium 2 ? Seriously ?? In Singapore they are rolling out Gigabit fibre connections as we speak (and there are no download limits on their plans). Fibre of such speeds (and like we are getting with the NBN) will cripple News, Time Warner etc. Why pay for fox when some bloke who has will stream it onto the net gratis. The telecomms companies are complicit in this ultra ultra high speed fibre rollout, the only effect of which will be to destroy FTA and cable TV platforms, mark my words.

Good old Telstra are charging me $2 a month more to go from 200GB @ 30mbps to 500GB @ 100mbps. Do they think LU and smh are the reason I wanna go to that level or do they probably know i wanna leech and download as much shit in a month as humanly possible ???

i have read only the last page of this thread about craig field and i have no idea how this post came about but... this ^^^^^^^^^^ pistol pete telling it exactly how it is, agree 100%. most people just believe wat is rammed down their throats by "governments" and take it as facts and truth that cant be disputed. majority of people just like to have the wool pulled over their eyes and think nothing more of it.

 

[gUt]

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

To think, this thread started off being about Craig Field.

Stop trying to take it OT bro

 

[Fire]

Oh CrazyTiger...

Come out, come out, wherever you are...

 

[_Johnsy]

Oh CrazyTiger...

Come out, come out, wherever you are...

 

[Fire]

:lol::lol::lol::lol: You win the internet with that one!!!!!

 

[Loudstrat]

Stick to footy Loudy, you are a funny guy, but you have no place here. Disturbingly, neither
does FIRE.

Telling me where I should or shouldnt be is a tad police-ish, isnt it?

Its my civil right to be here. Its also my civil right to call you a complete f*cktard.

 

[Grapple]

This thread took off.... :lol:

From his last few posts he really seemed to turn into a bit of a nut-bar didn't he?