Bazal
Post Whore
- Messages
- 102,689
Your abacus is broken. If he is released so not counted under the cap then someone needs to replace him. You can't have it both ways.
Incorrect, as far as I know. Unless the NRL back date his whole deal, the money we've already paid him still counts, as many have mentioned for payout purposes. A couple of years back we only had 21 players in our top 25 because of cap mismanagement, players who had been released were still being paid top 25 money
Shit EGJ was counted in our top 25 the year after he retired....so unless they've changed the rules he should still be in our top 25 regardless.