Mr Sharkie said:Ok so everyone has cried out in support of Dykes to keep his decision should Anasta come across, but we're forgetting that one of our best players this year has been our # 13.
Does Paul Gallen really deserve to be replaced?
Surely said:Dykes hooker , Anasta, hilder gone, would be 3 ordinary decisions there.
Hilder is hooker for defense, not attacking options, Dykes is too good a 5/8 to be hooker.
Anasta, well what can i say, spend the money on a centre, we don't need him the 5/8 we have now is way better.
Then we have Bird V Anasta, whats bird on, what does anasta want, can't see any value in that swap.
Maroubra Shark said:Dykes- Stays put
Anasta- Lock
Hilder- stays put
Not bad I say. IMO Braith has a hell of a lot more skill then Bird hence the money he wants. I see Braith as an extra half out wide who could create many oppurtunities as a ball running forward for our centres and wingers. Something Bird cant do.
Interesting, I have often wondered if he likes playing hooker, especially seeing as he gets limited time.jc155776 said:News is Hilder wants to go to England for the money but, and i cant blame him, if you had the choice of earning double somewhere why the hell not go....
PJ said:Folkes had a word to Anasta last year about playing lock and was told in no uncertain terms no.
So I'd be very surprised if he came here and played lock.
Unless he thinks it's his best option into rep footy?