Parko has highlighted it perfectly. And if you re-read my post, I mention staggering their experience. As it is, a number of young players were afforded heaps of game time this year. Amone, Feagai, Ramsay, Burns got some more game time, Hunt got a few games and Molo got ample time. Sullivan and Sloan got some games as well.
The reality is, you can't have a team full of youth. Especially ones that have been out of the game for the past 2 years. Most notably Newcastle tried that a few years back. They were at the bottom of the table for a couple of years while this happened and they still haven't fully recovered. And where are those players now? They weren't managed well and didn't have the experience in the team to offset the inexperience.
I've already stated it, but Cleary and Lui were staggered over a few years. From memory Cleary had been in the side for 3 years before Lui joined him on a more permanent basis.
Again, I've already pointed this out, but none of the top 8 teams have a spine with more than 1 rookie in them. At a minimum, they all had at least 1 experienced half.
i think I understand your point about 3 rookie’s in the spine. It a fair point (if I indeed follow it) but not one I subscribe to given our team atm, and the team we can develop in coming years.
my counter to your 3 rookie point is that if Hunt, Amone and Ramsey are there anyway, it’s the 4th position we are discussing. The only real experience hooker (assuming Hunt is a half) is macca. do I understand you mean he needs to be there? Or is Liddle experienced enough in your opinion?
personally, and based on this year, I would prefer a 3rd youth player rather than macca. And next year we have more experience in the youth players than this year. if we had recruited another hooker of experience who is faster, and can draw defenders rather than the obvious pass each time, then I may change my opinion. are you suggesting Liddle is the solution to this point. At this stage he is unproven and I am not convinced, hence I make my comments accordingly.
this takes me to the last point. Yes, I’d prefer to risk languishing next year to build a team, to give experience etc. than I would to meander in 9-14th position, and have our next gen players move on to our rivals.
hope that explains my pov.
oh, additional point. Your comment on staggering is ok. But if your affecting the advancement of some players, you need to get buy in for it to work. 2 requests for release indicate that’s not happening.