parra pete
Referee
- Messages
- 20,676
i agree. i don't see the point in slinging more sh*t at our club. surely 3p can see it would be better to deal with this in-house.
just out of curiousity, from a legal point of view, does anyone know what (if any) information the telegraph are actually allowed to publish. if the new board find df has breached something then fair enough, deal with it, but given the personal confidential nature of contracts - is any of it actualy allowed to be aired in public without the consent of df?
could someone with a deeper legal background than most of us on here (and not any old jackass with their own unfounded opinion) shed some light? i might ask a couple of legal eagle friends what they think.
What would a Manly supporter be able to offer in relation to the Eels?