Do you want Brad Arthur as coach

[Chipmunk]

We haven't been through this at all. Your if-then statement is a non sequitur.

It depends who the best player is. Would you sack a coach to keep Jarryd Hayne happy?

I've moved on and don't care.

 

[the phantom menace]

They're more authoritative anyway, because I show my evidence and logic.

You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.

Meanwhile there are merkins on your side of the debate who think that the result of a single game proves whatever point they're trying to make.

I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.

I don't mind cats.

I know.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.

Evidence is by definition selective.

I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.

It's a tired old shtick, just saying something is circular logic. Most of you don't even know what it means.

 

[Gary Gutful]

If you have to sack a coach to keep your best player, then clearly he is no longer the best person to be coaching your team.

*Cleary

 

[Gary Gutful]

Is Occam's Razor your buzzword of this week?

Occam's Razor is two words FFS!

 

[Soto]

Brad Arthur bemoans Leeds’ familiar failings despite glimmers of hope

New coach will want to see quick improvements after defeat to Hull KR if he is to commit long-term future

www.google.com