Chipmunk
Coach
- Messages
- 16,779
We haven't been through this at all. Your if-then statement is a non sequitur.
I've moved on and don't care.It depends who the best player is. Would you sack a coach to keep Jarryd Hayne happy?
We haven't been through this at all. Your if-then statement is a non sequitur.
I've moved on and don't care.It depends who the best player is. Would you sack a coach to keep Jarryd Hayne happy?
You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.They're more authoritative anyway, because I show my evidence and logic.
I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.Meanwhile there are merkins on your side of the debate who think that the result of a single game proves whatever point they're trying to make.
I know.I don't mind cats.
Evidence is by definition selective.You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.
It's a tired old shtick, just saying something is circular logic. Most of you don't even know what it means.I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.
*ClearyIf you have to sack a coach to keep your best player, then clearly he is no longer the best person to be coaching your team.
Occam's Razor is two words FFS!Is Occam's Razor your buzzword of this week?