Why did Souths re-sign John Sutton?
Forty-four years ago advertising man Charles Rosner coined the catchphrase, ‘If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.’ Rosner might not have been big on rugby league (being American and all), but even he would have been able to see that John Sutton has been given enough chances already. Souths have a highly-rated pack (currently underperforming, but still full of talent) and a serviceable backline. Even given the lack of go-forward, it is glaringly obvious that the Rabbitohs lack class at the scrumbase.
Many people believe that Chris Sandow will never become a top-line halfback. He lacks touch with his kicking, and despite brilliance as a ball-runner he does not show strong organisational skills. Given that Souths have expressed a desire to retain him (although Parramatta is also believed to be interested) the only option is to break the halves combination that has consistently failed to fire. Sutton has strong claims on the title of most frustrating player in the competition, given his obvious talent and physical prowess. Too often he looks like he would rather be splashing around in Maroubra surf rather than tackling opponents. As the senior player he should be taking pressure off Sandow, but he fails in this duty. He also fails to give star back Greg Inglis enough quality ball.
Despite all this, Sutton has been given a three-year contract extension, no doubt on big money – when offloading him could have eased salary cap pressures and given the player himself the opportunity for reinvention at another club. Souths should now trade Sandow and look for a better halfback option or the club will continue its recent record of mediocrity.
.
