nah , just conspiracy theorists ... you often see the same person involved in those situations, they are slowing the play the ball because they were responsible for the fact they are there . So its an forced error to make up for a unforced error . See it all the time ,it's just people would be trying to link it all due to someone punting . meh .
it looks sus because he gave the ball away in the first place
They showed the footage on Offsiders. Looked pretty bad. If they were doing a sneaky they couldnt pull it off.THE NRL is poised to call on police to help with investigations into the betting plunge before the Bulldogs-North Queensland match. The allegations come amid claims Bulldogs forward Ryan Tandy was banned by a Central Coast leagues club 10 years ago over an unpaid TAB bet (see story right).
It is also alleged a player involved in the Cowboys-Bulldogs game owes a large amount of money to bookmakers. The NRL last night refused to identify any individuals who might be implicated in any alleged sting.
But a source confirmed yesterday that "as sure as night follows day" police will be called into investigate.
The NRL has called in Racing NSW chief steward Ray Murrihy to head the investigation, which centres around a big plunge on the first scoring play in the Cowboys-Bulldogs match. Punters stood to win more than $250,000 if the Cowboys kicked a penalty goal.
The Bulldogs conceded a penalty in front of their posts within the first two minutes, but the Cowboys took a tap.
The fact that a penalty goal - normally a low-interest wager - was so heavily backed convinced bookmakers to stop betting on the option hours before kick-off.
Tandy, who dropped the ball after the first hit-up before conceding the penalty, strongly denied any involvement.
hey guys, i reckon i've found weidler's account.
Also suss - wasn't the Cowpats involved in a game with similar allegations at a similar time of the year last season???
And yes, Rusty's band, I agree. Voss crapped on about a bloke betting a years wage at $1.20 against anyone getting a 40/20 in the Warriors game. It was talking point for a few minutes. Then they insert the meek "bet responsibly" - like after commentating for ages on a totally irresponsible bet? If it's not that it's a story about a racehorse that someone part owns.....
Also suss - wasn't the Cowpats involved in a game with similar allegations at a similar time of the year last season???
And yes, Rusty's band, I agree. Voss crapped on about a bloke betting a years wage at $1.20 against anyone getting a 40/20 in the Warriors game. It was talking point for a few minutes. Then they insert the meek "bet responsibly" - like after commentating for ages on a totally irresponsible bet? If it's not that it's a story about a racehorse that someone part owns.....
Also suss - wasn't the Cowpats involved in a game with similar allegations at a similar time of the year last season???
I never thought of this kind of fix. I mean I've always heard of Winning or losing. I guess you wouldn't feel as guilty giving away a penalty.
Also suss - wasn't the Cowpats involved in a game with similar allegations at a similar time of the year last season???
And yes, Rusty's band, I agree. Voss crapped on about a bloke betting a years wage at $1.20 against anyone getting a 40/20 in the Warriors game. It was talking point for a few minutes. Then they insert the meek "bet responsibly" - like after commentating for ages on a totally irresponsible bet? If it's not that it's a story about a racehorse that someone part owns.....