Charles Bronson
Bench
- Messages
- 4,215
welcome to first grade
Does Des have to be reminded that Watmough was done for DUI and was not banned?
This is seriously sad. Every time an incident happens, someone out Brookvale way is having a cry about the punishment and referring back to Stewart. Seriously... he's free, move on.
Because there is a double standard there, push bias aside dude, you're a self confessed Manly hater to the core.
Des Hasler, Manly fans who agree with him.... SHUT THE f**k UP.
This is seriously sad. Every time an incident happens, someone out Brookvale way is having a cry about the punishment and referring back to Stewart. Seriously... he's free, move on.
Raiders fans, Carney had numerous chances at your club - this is his first major stuff up with the tricolours and it's still very minor by comparison to his indiscretions in Canberra. Bitter doesn't even begin to cover it.
I don't like the Roosters and I think Carney's a wanker, but I'm sick of the stupid reactions that come out of some parts.
were you sooking about double standards when the NRL didnt suspend watmough after his 2010 season launch antics?
how bout when Tony Williams didnt get suspended for his DUI after Jake Friend got 2 weeks for his?
The issue from my point of view is prior form. Carney has it. To be honest after our 09 launch Watmough deserved to be suspended before Stewart as he has a record of being a dick. Stewart didn't. Do I think Carney deserved a suspension after this last incident? No, but surely you can see how manly fans are a little miffed.
Great post Danish. I have the sh*ts because no other club was held to account during the period of madness you refer to more than the sharks and we're still paying for it to a degree. I'll confess there is a miserable part of me that wants every club to suffer the same fate from a fairness point of view.No, I cant.
We had a player suspended for a first offence DUI (jake friend) in 2009 as well - which was also the wrong decision. The NRL went haywire in those couple of months, threatening suspensions left right and centre, culminating in the forcing out of the game of Brett Seymour for, shock horror, being drunk in public (crime of the century you'll agree)
After that period of madness settled down we've had numerous incidents since, all low level drinking stuff, and the NRL has rightfully kept their noses out of it. the only player whose copped a stint on the sidelines since was Nate Myles.... but that was thoroughly, THOROUGHLY deserved.
Sure, our clubs and the sharks got stooged in 09 with a couple blokes being suspended and one being forced out, but personally I am happier that the NRL decided not to continue down the bullsh*t road of getting personally involved in any and all behavioural issues and are now rightfully leaving it for clubs to handle in house.
I agree 100% Danish but I also can see why others are pissed with the decision. Also with Friend, i forgot that was that his first. I remember him being in trouble a few times but can't recall the 1st time.
Des Hasler, Manly fans who agree with him.... SHUT THE f**k UP.
This is seriously sad. Every time an incident happens, someone out Brookvale way is having a cry about the punishment and referring back to Stewart. Seriously... he's free, move on.
Raiders fans, Carney had numerous chances at your club - this is his first major stuff up with the tricolours and it's still very minor by comparison to his indiscretions in Canberra. Bitter doesn't even begin to cover it.
I don't like the Roosters and I think Carney's a wanker, but I'm sick of the stupid reactions that come out of some parts.
Lets compare apples to apples. Gallop has repeatedly claimed that Stewart was not suspended because of the sexual assault allegations. He was suspended for being drunk and bringing the game into disrepute. The facts are that he was accused of drinking too much. He was asked to leave, and did so without incident. He left in a cab. It was for these actions that Gallop claimed he was suspended. What happened after that (according to Gallop) had nothing to do with his punishment.
Now, do you all understand that? I'll repeat it for those who are slow on the uptake. Stewart (a cleanskin at the time) was suspended for being asked to leave a pub, which he did, and getting into a cab.
Now repeat offender Carney (who I actually don't mind) received a far lesser punishment for DUI. And people think this doesn't deserve to be challenged?
Des Hasler, Manly fans who agree with him.... SHUT THE f**k UP.
This is seriously sad. Every time an incident happens, someone out Brookvale way is having a cry about the punishment and referring back to Stewart. Seriously... he's free, move on.
Raiders fans, Carney had numerous chances at your club - this is his first major stuff up with the tricolours and it's still very minor by comparison to his indiscretions in Canberra. Bitter doesn't even begin to cover it.
I don't like the Roosters and I think Carney's a wanker, but I'm sick of the stupid reactions that come out of some parts.
FFS. No one thinks what happened to Stewart was right. Get over it.
Have fun missing the top 8 Mr Hasler
Me? Personally I am over it - the minute he was found not guilty of the sexual assault allegations I moved on.
However I'm more defending Hasler's comments as he has obviously been personally affected by the way an apparently decent person was crucified.
And I think you're wrong. There are a few ignorant tools on here who have no problem with Stewart's suspension and they need to be educated.