You'd have to be fairly plastered to blow .052 at 7 the next morning.
No you don't.
You'd have to be fairly plastered to blow .052 at 7 the next morning.
No you don't.
7am? I may have missed something... where did it say it was 7am? I thought it was driving home the same night?
Bottom line is that I (and I dare say plenty of other people) are sick to death of Manly fans and now officials bringing up the Stewart saga EVERY time someone does something wrong as if they're all directly comparable. They aren't, Stewart's free, he'll be back on the park in 7 days and 10 hours officially.
What needs to be kept in mind is that there is no standard punishment because each situation is different, needs to be treated differently and managed appropriately.
Stewart's redemption came in September 2010 when he was acquitted - he'll absolutely tear opposition sides apart this year. Do you think he really wants this incident bought up (even by his own coach) every time it happens? I actually feel sorry for Brett with the way Dessie and some of thefans are carrying on.
The issue from my point of view is prior form. Carney has it. To be honest after our 09 launch Watmough deserved to be suspended before Stewart as he has a record of being a dick. Stewart didn't. Do I think Carney deserved a suspension after this last incident? No, but surely you can see how manly fans are a little miffed.
Personally I think the NRL f**ked up royally when the Brett Stewart incident blew up - because they didn't judge the case on it's merits but wet themselves under media scrutiny.
Brett Stewart was suspended for being drunk at a club function. f**k me, if that was a sackable offence at one time all NRL games in the first four rounds would have been between Hazem El Masri and Jason Stevens.
Gallop and the NRL caved to media pressure and as they couldnt sack him for an alleged incident (unproven and frankly completely unbelievable in Bretts case) as there were too many other incidents that had gone unpunished. So they came up with a completely bogus reason and then trumpeted that they were getting tough on alcohol.
As if anyone believed a thing. They were caving to the media and they shouldnt have done. This time the NRL actually got it right.
I really felt sorry for Brett when the NRL did what they did as he of all players didn't deserve that. I understands Des bitterness over that, but in light of that dumb merkin Watmough - maybe Des should take a big dose of shut the f**k up.
Looking at the bigger picture, imagine the headlines if the Dally M player of the year was suspended for 4 weeks.
Stewart's punishment was a knee jerk reaction, we all know it and in hindsight id say David Gallop knows it too. The fact that the game didn't make the same mistake twice is a good thing.
Try and keep things in perspective you idiots out there.
Spot on. My point is Des being so close to the Stewart situation he is obviously a little bitter. Many of us cannot fully understand as we were not directly involved. So whilst its easy for all of us to say he should shut up we were not impacted as much by the NRL's decision. And I agree that Des should let sleeping dogs lie. He has had his say now is time to let it go.
As a lifelong Manly supporter I don't see how getting stuck into Todd Carney is doing the my club any favours, either with other fans or the controlling body itself.
Des may have the right to feel pissed off on behalf of Brett but he should save his words until the defamation case goes to court.
I'm a bit old school and already feel that players are under far to much scrutiny, rugby league is a tribal sport and each supporter often feels that there club has been unfairly treated.
Wanting to tear young blokes lives apart to gain advantage doesn't sit well with me. Of course there are always going to be exceptions but lets try and keep things in perspective.
7am? I may have missed something... where did it say it was 7am? I thought it was driving home the same night?
Wouldn't Hasler complaining of double standards regarding the Carney issue and not the Watmough issue be....double standards?