Saints Forever
Bench
- Messages
- 3,954
No mention of Sele
Am guessing this means his contract won’t be renewed
Am guessing this means his contract won’t be renewed
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Unless we pulled it wich could be true true
Good stuff Samy. I can't understand the hate for either players. The ISP players have buckley's and none being coached by another inept coach. Wish it was different but it isn't. Hopefully Luke Phillips is invested in these young players or they may as well go get a day job elsewhere. Cheers.
I think Sele is a bit small for what Mary wants from him, I think he would make an excellent bench utility forward, Mary dosnt seem to think that's a good idea and prefers using wingers and centres in that role maybe he would be better off at another club.
A big shame we haven't been able to develop Kerr in the same way. We will still be one good prop short.
ufty as to whether he can overcome the shortcomings in his game. If the view is he has not progressed sufficiently, then bite the bullet and look for an alternative. The fullback role is too important to have a player who relies almost exclusively on his speed in attack as his reason for being in first grade. He should also be able to pull through tackles, stand in tackles and offload and make metres hitting the ball up from kicks besides showing solid defence and positioning.There was talk about trying to get Musgrave, does anyone know if this is still on now that we have signed Korbin.
I think, if we could sign Musgrave as well, then things would be looking good in the forwards. Next thing we need is a big, fast, aggressive back (Radradra, Vunivalu, Cotrick, Rapana style player). I dont think we can rely on our juniors filling all the holes in our backline and I dont see any of our juniors filling this role.
A call needs to be made re
Before I have posters jumping down my throat, I am not saying to get rid of him. I am saying we need to stay objective about whether he is making the grade in all areas or not and if he is, fantastic, stay with him because he is lightning. If he isnt dont gamble, make the hard call.
The choice is do you want a small fullback who occasionally gets exposed at the back, sometimes due to size, more often experience, BUT has electrifying pace and turn a game on its head.
I think "cut off" is harsh.
