Dragon_Taylor6
Juniors
- Messages
- 724
...what?? ...Lui???
now that guy IS overrated !!
He's got to be slower than Matthew Head.
No thanks
I would have him in the team if fit and young.
...what?? ...Lui???
now that guy IS overrated !!
He's got to be slower than Matthew Head.
No thanks
yeah because Dugan is always injury free...
plus his asking price would now be DOUBLE what we paid for Beale, probably more than double actually...
paying overs for a player always injured... how is that a better option?
No ThanksFor what it's worth, heard on the radio this morning that Robert Lui is also in the mix
less than 5 weeks into his chance we are talking about signing a better fullback.
Sure Beale is injured at the moment, but next season he wouldnt be happy with Dugan at the back..
Now that we are the most popular destination mentioned for player signings, should we have an on-going "Rumoured Signings" thread ( like the main NRL forum ) ? It might make it easier for everyone.
Carney is just using us to jack up his price for Sharks.
I find it extremely doubtful he'd leave Cronulla, & if he did, it wouldn't be with us. Imagine telling Gallen & the rest of them that you've just signed with St. George. f**k that lol.
Who's buying a team.We need a half option and a back option,and every player is injury prone,look at Beale now.We are back to the problem we had last year at fullback and our juniors options are another season away so signing Dugan would add plenty to our team.Talented they may be but Dugan and Carney are also injury prone and immature. I would rather see the Dragons develop junior talent within the club rather than buying a team. If I wanted that I would have supported Manly, Canterbury, Easts etc. I don't mind the club buying a player or two but not too many, please.
I can just see it. K Stanley, Carney, C Stanley, Goodwin, Beale and Dugan, 20 minutes into the game and they all go down with a knee injury.
Maybe we should also get Campese as well. he is perfect, he's from Canberra AND he is injury prone.
sure, dugan may be injury prone. but, look at beale. he's already had one knee reconstuction, and has now injured the same knee. therefore, sure it'd be more worthwhile heavily investing into dugan, who has bucket loads of talent?
So how does the logic work?
Beale is injury prone having had two knee reconstructions not one. Therefore, it is okay to replace him with another injury prone player who is also a basket case?
How do you figure?
No question Dugan has talent, but what good is his talent from the sidelines
My point is, everyone has seemed have been happy with having beale there, despite his knack of picking up an injury, and people are then saying, "well what about poor beale after he comes back next season?". On the other hand, with dugan, people are totally paying attention to his injury history.
Carney is not world class, he goes missing in the big games...
Plus IMO signing Dugan would mean letting Beale leave when his contract expires. Beale chose the Dragons because we promised him the opportunity to play fullback. now less than 5 weeks into his chance we are talking about signing a better fullback.
Sure Beale is injured at the moment, but next season he wouldnt be happy with Dugan at the back..
](*,) What I mean is... Most people have been happy to have Beale at full back, despite his injury problems. He's had 2 knee recons, one on each knee, and has injured his knee again. Yet, people are saying that dugan shouldn't be signed, because he's injury prone. I don't see their logic there. I didn't hear people complain about injury problems before we signed beale. I could be wrong, but that's just the impression I'm getting.what?