- Messages
- 19,867
I guess they would be considered known to each other now.I thought AVOs where more of a thing between persons known to each other?
I guess they would be considered known to each other now.I thought AVOs where more of a thing between persons known to each other?
Chuck him in the same shipping container as Payne's Mum.A kiwi? Can be deported then if alleged incident is proven.
(a) with any part of the body or with anything else, or
in circumstances where a reasonable person would consider the touching to be sexual.
(1A) The continuation of sexual touching as defined in subsection (1) is also
"sexual touching" for the purposes of this Division.
(2) The matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a reasonable personwould consider touching to be sexual include--
Click to expand...(c) whether any other aspect of the touching (including the circumstances in which it is done) makes it sexual.
Click to expand...
(3) Touching carried out solely for proper medical or hygienic purposes is not
"sexual touching" for the purposes of this Division.
Well that puts a light on things.Here is the legal definition:
CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 61HB
Meaning of "sexual touching"
61HB Meaning of "sexual touching"
(1) For the purposes of this Division,
"sexual touching" means a person touching another person--
in circumstances where a reasonable person would consider the touching to be sexual.
CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 61HB Meaning of "sexual touching"
www5.austlii.edu.au
Not sure, but what happened with that?Isn't this the same charge Scott Bolton received in the Bondi bar years ago?
Either at bedoiun or the golden sheaf lmao
A lot of restraint on this forum, so some things can change... usually there would be fans of club player plays for being tentatively supportive with caveats, and other team supporters split on a gulity v. wait for more info basis.Coverage of this by the terrorgraph compared to Paul Kent is hilarious
they will never change
Will Fox League refer to it as a personal matter’ and say nothing further about it?
Kent is trending on Twitter.Coverage of this by the terrorgraph compared to Paul Kent is hilarious
they will never change
No, we don't stand with Dylan.Kent is trending on Twitter.
Is that the NRL fans telling the Tele we stand with Dylan.
Brown lives matter....Is that the NRL fans telling the Tele we stand with Dylan.