Sorry Mr Pou, I was very busy at work today, let me respond:
That's bad luck. I just got home after five months away and now I'm on holidays for six weeks. I reckon I might wear out my eye f**king keyboard.
Jack Gibson said the same thing about Peter Sterling being the smartest footballer he had ever seen. Sterlo also has a great personality. So if I use your logic he would be a great coach also. I'm running with it.
Does Sterlo really have a great personality? He has done nothing but put shit on the Eels since he started commentating, so he has no sense of loyalty.
And I'm reading Gibson's book right now. I had no idea he was such a gangster, but I can tell you he seemed like a proper f**kwit.
Proving that a 'good personality' isn't the same as the 'right personality' for coaching.
Grow up? :lol::lol:. Maybe you should just admit when you have been proven wrong
Proven wrong? All you've done is throw around the word 'f**kwit' like you just discovered the term.
At least 'f**k your eyes' is funny.
It's all relative. So it doesn't matter. Sterling was still a master playermaker and organiser. Didn't you see that yourself ?
He was indeed, but he played the game back in a time when tactics mattered so much, teams weren't as well drilled as they are now, and teams needed some guy on the field (the halfback) who knew the gameplan and could explain it to his teammates (or at least their place in it) in the middle of a match.
These guys (old school halfbacks) have been replaced by instinctive playmakers who work off the back of a quick play-the-ball.
Told you it was funny.
