yy_cheng
Coach
- Messages
- 18,734
Well this article at least has quotes.
If it is Arthurs:
PLEASE tell me he's on a 1 year contract, with 2nd and 3rd years in the clubs favour (or something like that).
He just doesn't strike me as a head coach.... More like an angry little deadbeat.
I loved his responses to the idiotic Facebook questions last year. He doesn't suffer fools.
That's why he doesn't have Twitter.
JT or Arthurs either way i'm happy.
If you take out, from any coach's record (barring Gibson, Bennett etc), the years in which they had their strongest team, they will typically look pretty ordinary. I don't know if you remember the state of the Panthers team where he started his coaching career...he took them to their first ever finals appearance. When he took over the Raiders they were far from the finished product (though they had made the GF the year before). It's easy to say that anyone could have coached the Raiders......sorry I just don't buy that.
Hindsight is 20/20.
terrible decision if it is Arthurs, this could be worse then kearney and Stuart
God this club is shit, we promoted a dud to CEO and now a dud of a coach.
terrible decision if it is Arthurs, this could be worse then kearney and Stuart
God this club is shit, we promoted a dud to CEO and now a dud of a coach.
Of the coaches on the open market who would you go with RJ?
JT or Brian Smith, both on 2 year deals however if i were CEO the first thing i would be doing is calling Bellamy's or Bennett agent and offering them a huge wad of cash - proven winners.
We always go for the coaches no one wants, or proven duds, and to even consider Sheens in any capacity has given me grave doubts about our current board and CEO, any minimal due diligence would've uncovered this
What is it about arthurs and our CEO that makes them crap?
Why is JT any more qualified than Arthur?