84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,651
In games we conceded 30+, we didn’t lose because of goalkickingI think you know which matches whe lost early in the year because of his shit goal kicking. Try Rnd 2 and 3.
In games we conceded 30+, we didn’t lose because of goalkickingI think you know which matches whe lost early in the year because of his shit goal kicking. Try Rnd 2 and 3.
Fine, his goal kicking was 80% in 2023. Stats says so.In games we conceded 30+, we didn’t lose because of goalkicking
Strategy without money is just hot air. Do you think Cleary set up the program at Penrith?
You want to break down to individual efforts in games, in the Sharks game we had 32 missed tackles and 15 errors. Moses kicking a couple of conversions would’ve papered over thoseFine, his goal kicking was 80% in 2023. Stats says so.
The Eels had a 70% win record with Paul Carriage in 1998. He obviously had a great year. Stats says so.
Breaking down to individual games or efforts in games, clearly doesn’t tell the full story.
It was 5 tries a piece. They kicked 5 from 5 and we kicked 3 from 5.You want to break down to individual efforts in games, in the Sharks game we had 32 missed tackles and 15 errors. Moses kicking a couple of conversions would’ve papered over those
I deadset thought this was a Pou post.Fine, his goal kicking was 80% in 2023. Stats says so.
The Eels had a 70% win record with Paul Carriage in 1998. He obviously had a great year. Stats says so.
Breaking down to individual games or efforts in games, clearly doesn’t tell the full story.
You need to ask yourself. If Cleary is so good, why did he win f**k all for the first 15 years of his career.We are just throwing footys around, this isnt formula1
I'd say the Sharks were lucky to kick 5 from 5. That game was a lottery and we lost. If we'd won we would've played finals.It was 5 tries a piece. They kicked 5 from 5 and we kicked 3 from 5.
We scrambled enough to win the match. You don’t have to win every stat, but scoring more points is one of those crucial ones.
WTF merkin, I completely disagree with his post. Not all stats are relevant, and I'll f**king tell you which ones are. You don't decide for yourself. You're not qualified.I deadset thought this was a Pou post.
Has he hacked your account.
Im sure if you asked BA he would reckon its his responsibility.Maybe this mysterious "system" that pre-dates and out-lasts ten year head coaches is somehow the job of that bunch of random men in suits that meet once a month and change positions every three years... that's make sense!
I'm sure I've heard head coaches talk about their systems, or the system they'll bring into their new clubs - but at Parra for some reason "the system" is never the coach's fault or responsibility...
Sure if you think the problem was the 2 missed kicks instead of the 5 tries against, you go aheadIt was 5 tries a piece. They kicked 5 from 5 and we kicked 3 from 5.
We scrambled enough to win the match. You don’t have to win every stat, but scoring more points is one of those crucial ones.
No. Just no....You need to ask yourself. If Cleary is so good, why did he win f**k all for the first 15 years of his career.
Or the over 30 missed tackles, that was our problem all year. Something that has never been addressed in all Arthur’Z time here.Sure if you think the problem was the 2 missed kicks instead of the 5 tries against, you go ahead
Best Gronky post ever ;-)
Who's responsible for creating, implementing, improving and maintaining "the system", if not the head coach (of 10-12 years)?
Who's responsible for creating, implementing, improving and maintaining "the system", if not the head coach (of 10-12 years)?
OK... and who is it then at the Eels exactly, if we know somehow who everyone who is (and isn't) responsible of gets credit for the Panthers' entire set-up?