Ok... you're the one that was replying and questioning others (me in this case) putting across a point of view that the head coach must have some accountability for at least continued maintenance and improvement of "the system" - which it seems some people (you in this case) like to infer the coach carries no role and/or accountability.Because I have NFI what you are smoking I asked my mate Chat gtp to clarify what you want..
They are so desperate for a scapegoat that they attribute a club's entire success or failure to one person. No wonder ChatGPT thinks they're f**kwits.That last paragraph sums it up nicely I think
Ok... you're the one that was replying and questioning others (me in this case) putting across a point of view that the head coach must have some accountability for at least continued maintenance and improvement of "the system" - which it seems some people (you in this case) like to infer the coach carries no role and/or accountability.
And now you've gone ChatGPT instead of have a discussion - that's even sub-Pou level . The rest of your post? TL.DR.
I’ve got ChatGPT on ignore merkin!!They are so desperate for a scapegoat that they attribute a club's entire success or failure to one person. No wonder ChatGPT thinks they're f**kwits.
Ciraldo and Webster only recently left since all these players have been developed same as Barrett he was there when Cleary and Lui where coming through.
Its the system and team of coaches that develop these players not 1 coach.
Arthur has done fine with the resources he has as a head coach.
Brian To'o was NSW player of the year - Has only ever played under Ivan
Liam Martin now a test player only played under Ivan.
Crichton and so on.
They both need to work together, the system needs to produce the style of player the head coach wants.
It also doesn't produce rep players. So maybe 20% is the coach and the rest is the system
The Eels had a 70% win record with Paul Carriage in 1998. He obviously had a great year. Stats says so.
Who's responsible for creating, implementing, improving and maintaining "the system", if not the head coach (of 10-12 years)?
BA has had ten years, there should be a thriving and successful football program here at Parramatta. I don't see it.
I think it would be different at every club. If you consider all the responsibilities required for the success of an NRL club, these responsibilities would be distributed among a handful of senior management types, including the head coach and various GMs.I'm guessing it's a 'whole of club' type situation where lots of people have input into which strategies are used.
I'm guessing the bloke with the title of Head of Football would be the most likely person to be in charge of implementing it. That would be Mark O'Neill.
Really ? How was his 1999 year ? He was 26 and in his prime.He did have a good year in 1998.
JUst had a shocker in the PF.
Really ? How was his 1999 year ? He was 26 and in his prime.
We've made the finals 5 of the last 7 years and made the GF season before last.
Had an off year last season, but were still in the mix to make the finals again towards the end of the year.
It may not be the most successful football program in the NRL, but it's not bad and it's improving.
100% the week before he had a good game and up to that point he was fine, not great, not bad. But he was never good enough to overcome the worst 30 minutes of all time.He went to Salford that year.
Retired after the 1999 season.
We just had better players coming through (Schifcoske, Burt, Wagon).
He was a decent winger, an ok fullback. Can't remember seeing him play in the centres.
He was close to man of the match in the final against the Broncos two weeks before the shocker. I think that game just broke him.
But Brad dosent report to him so a Mexican Stand Off is always possible.I'm guessing it's a 'whole of club' type situation where lots of people have input into which strategies are used.
I'm guessing the bloke with the title of Head of Football would be the most likely person to be in charge of implementing it. That would be Mark O'Neill.
Brad doesn't report to anyone by the looks, something else that isn't his job.But Brad dosent report to him so a Mexican Stand Off is always possible.
I'm with Pou (except for his sloppy and inflammatory final sentence) - I think it would be different at each club. Very hard to say definitively.I'm guessing it's a 'whole of club' type situation where lots of people have input into which strategies are used.
I'm guessing the bloke with the title of Head of Football would be the most likely person to be in charge of implementing it. That would be Mark O'Neill.