Noise
Coach
- Messages
- 18,168
Even before he was injured his line breaks, LBAs and try assists were down.My bad. He did single out Waqa and Sivo.
On Moses he said that he had improved markedly until he got injured.
Even before he was injured his line breaks, LBAs and try assists were down.My bad. He did single out Waqa and Sivo.
On Moses he said that he had improved markedly until he got injured.
And on Sivo...I really think when Brad Parker from Manly stopped him in his tracks and fkd his knee his season regressed badly.Even before he was injured his line breaks, LBAs and try assists were down.
Interesting end of season review discussion with Bernie Gurr:
https://thecumberlandthrow.com/2020/10/15/the-tip-sheet-2020-season-review-feat-bernie-gurr/
Yeah I reckon the same. He just wasn't the same after that hitAnd on Sivo...I really think when Brad Parker from Manly stopped him in his tracks and fkd his knee his season regressed badly.
I don't think he fully recovered from that as impact was lacking and quite often either driven back or stopped immediately
I disagree with him on that. Most guys improved, a couple were no better or worse (Blake, Nrown, Matterson), but a few went backwards:My bad. He did single out Waqa and Sivo.
On Moses he said that he had improved markedly until he got injured.
You mean when we were coming first up to Rnd 9 ? He tore his calf during the lockdown and then again vs Raiders in Rnd 7. Took 3 weeks off and was never the same. Many will say that we were never the same.Even before he was injured his line breaks, LBAs and try assists were down.
Yep, that's exactly what I mean. Up to and including the Canberra game (round 7) he only had:You mean when we were coming first up to Rnd 9 ? He tore his calf during the lockdown and then again vs Raiders in Rnd 7. Took 3 weeks off and was never the same. Many will say that we were never the same.
I’m guessing that means him being the chief playmaker in a team running first, someone else must have been steering them around. Who was that bc they must have been doing a great job.Yep, that's exactly what I mean. Up to and including the Canberra game (round 7) he only had:
1 try
2 try assists
1 line break
0 line break assists
These were all well down on his 2019 averages. His missed tackles were similar.
Lol, every aspect was down on last year except the subjective ‘steering them around the park’ so that means he improved? He regressed. Everyone except you and Bernie can see that.I’m guessing that means him being the chief playmaker in a team running first, someone else must have been steering them around. Who was that bc they must have been doing a great job.
Actually "everyone" is just you and a few others. We are now a top 4 team and he got us there with two bung calves. You still haven't answered the qn on how we managed to jag coming first for the first half if the season when Moses had regressed as you say.Lol, every aspect was down on last year except the subjective ‘steering them around the park’ so that means he improved? He regressed. Everyone except you and Bernie can see that.
Actually "everyone" is just you and a few others. We are now a top 4 team and he got us there with two bung calves. You still haven't answered the qn on how we managed to jag coming first for the first half if the season when Moses had regressed as you say.
Because a couple of other players improved significantly - Junior and Gutho, on top of our new recruits adding value - RCG and Matterson.Actually "everyone" is just you and a few others. We are now a top 4 team and he got us there with two bung calves. You still haven't answered the qn on how we managed to jag coming first for the first half if the season when Moses had regressed as you say.
So if CCTV footage clearly showed there was no contact between Sivo and the girl's skirt why was there a charge of indecent assault and / or why did it take so long to sort out?
If CCTV showed there was no contact why would a pay off be needed?took time to work out how much was needed in the paper bags....
How else will Sivo get his $500k?If CCTV showed there was no contact why would a pay off be needed?