Hadley just said that he believes that Roy Spag had "promised the job to Tony Zappia and wishes to honour that commitment".
:crazy:
If he is the best candidate then we are in trouble IMO. Not saying that he is a bad person or administrator, but he comes with massive baggage. We don't need the media attention right now.
we're getting slated right now on 702 for even considering Zappia.
I completely agree.
I would rather Andrew Hill stay in the role than have Zappia. Nothing against Zappia, it woiuld be better for the club not to have him. We'd be giving the media a free kick - 'Eels reward disgraced Zappia'
And that is exactly the main reason why we shouldn't.....
Maybe we should all send Spagnolo an email, expressing our thoughts.
Suity
regardless of the sharks investigation and findings of the matter, after all the crap our club was dragged through during the power struggle, i can't see bringing zappia back here doing us good.
zappia may well have the best credentials for the job, i don't know, but we don't need the attention brought to the club.
Maybe we should all send Spagnolo an email, expressing our thoughts.
Suity
that should be all that matters, considering he has been cleared of any wrong doing or anything illegal
or perhaps some people may want a P R man who will run the club into to ground, financially
OT: Hadley also said that the W/Tigers will appoint their new CEO today. The son of former NSWRL Kevin Humphries (who's first name escapes me). Apparently he played fullback for Balmain and post football has carved himself a significant career working as an executive with both Qantas & British Airways.
This will all die down just like the Matty Johns situation/beat up
In 2010, the structure will remain the same
Because the Sharks finances really picked up with Zappia.
There is the opportunity for the club to really move forward.
Why take a step back and appoint somebody who generated nothing but negative headlines when he was in a CEO role?