What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels Salary Cap MK III

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
The NRL have underestimated the power of the courts and the board's decision to use it. Can you begin to imagine if this comes to a hearing and Seward is issued a subpoena to give evidence? It would be a bloodbath for not only him but the NRL. Conflicts of interest, self incrimination, the reliability of the evidence of a whistleblower et al. There is no way the NRL would want this. That is why the NRL will compromise and settle this with a reduction in penalty. That's how I see it anyway.

if the NRL do that we should tell them to suck our dicks and we'll see them in court

we should alo sue the crap out of the DT
 
Last edited:
Messages
42,876
EAD Kent you Maggot.

f**ken oath. How funny is this? Greenberg discovers he's committing career suicide and begins the backpedalling. His previous chum realises he's not gonna soothe the butthurt, and turns on his chum. NRL 360 is going to be so sweet to watch from now on.
 

^b0ss^

Juniors
Messages
1,369
the Kent sounds like a real prick not happy when we are over the cap,not happy when we are under the cap.
 

^b0ss^

Juniors
Messages
1,369
"In 1989 he played in one first grade match for the Parramatta Eels at halfback, becoming the 481st player for the club".

Blah lmao.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
16,687
Because alot of people, e.g lawyers, can pick holes in it

Making the Breach Notice confidential through a court order would not apply to lawyers who may choose to challenge the information in court. It's about making it confidential to the general public.
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,559
Making the Breach Notice confidential through a court order would not apply to lawyers who may choose to challenge the information in court. It's about making it confidential to the general public.

So my neighbour, who is a lawyer can just request for a copy?

He's interested in how incompetent the report is. He is saints fan though
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
32,907
So it was Scott Seward all along. How isn't that a conflict of interest seeing that Greenberg and him have been good friends for a while? How can his evidence be accepted as reliable if he was alleged to be a rogue CEO and possibly at the very least involved with the breaches? Did he have an epiphany or is revenge the motivator? He has given a 37 page statement. Why can't our board or their legal representatives test the veracity of Seward's evidence? This is why an extra 28 days was given to respond. Interesting times ahead. I cannot see this ending in June.

http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/pa...tors-pursue-legal-action-20160506-gonsgq.html
 
Last edited:

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,788
So it was Scott Seward all along. How isn't that a conflict of interest seeing that Greenberg and him have been good friends for a while? How can his evidence be accepted as reliable if he was alleged to be a rogue CEO and possibly at the very least involved with the breaches? Did he have an epiphany or is revenge the motivator? He has given a 37 page statement. Why can't our board or their legal representatives test the veracity of Seward's evidence? This is why an extra 28 days was given to respond. Interesting times ahead. I cannot see this ending in June.

http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/pa...tors-pursue-legal-action-20160506-gonsgq.html

I reckon it's possible a sneaky deal could be made. Board to go for a reduction in points penalty. DA/CEO cleared.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,170

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
42,763
It's at the least a little interesting that the NRL saw fit to apply for the report to be ruled as confidential, and the club has not.

I would have expected that with such a damning report, it would have been the club and / or Go5 who would have benefited least from it being aired publicly.

Just as interesting will be observing whether any of the parties actually prevent the document from being leaked.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,170
This is The Australian's version of what happened yesterday.

NRL forced to backflip on banned Parramatta Eels officials

The NRL was yesterday accused of living in a parallel universe and urged to clean up its own backyard after being forced to backflip on warnings that Parramatta would be unable to play for premiership points while the five suspended officials were engaged in a legal battle against the game’s governing body.

Legal sources confirmed that the NRL had sent correspondence to the representatives for the suspended officials — chairman Steve Sharp, fellow board members Tom Issa and Peter Serrao, chief executive John Boulous and football manager Daniel Anderson — on Thursday night outlining that their case had no impact on whether the club could play for premiership points.

It marked an early victory for the five banned officials — their legal representatives were engaged in the Supreme Court with the NRL yesterday morning — allowing them to continue in their roles for the immediate future despite misgivings from NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg. It also means they will be able to play a role in getting the club under the salary cap.

Regardless, the Eels are set to be docked at least 12 points for breaches of the salary cap once the club has been given time to respond to the allegations. Any points acquired once the club has moved under the salary cap — they hope to be in that position by the time they face South Sydney next week — will be at the discretion of the NRL.

The club is furiously attempting to shave money off their cap for the remainder of this season, with that move largely set to rest on how the NRL views the club’s application to have backrower Anthony Watmough considered for a career-ending injury.

The club has forwarded paperwork for Watmough to the NRL, with a decision likely to be made early next week by the governing body. That in itself is set to cause controversy, with rival club chief executives already set to raise the matter — and the precedent it potentially sets — with NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg.

They are likely to put it on the agenda again at a meeting of club bosses next month. For the time being, the Eels are intent on manoeuvring room under their salary cap to ensure they are playing for premiership points once the game against the Rabbitohs arrives.

Greenberg had indicated the club would be unable to earn any premiership points while legal action remained afoot. However, the NRL yesterday confirmed that was no longer the case, prompting a scathing reaction from some within the Parramatta camp.

“This is the whole point — they have absolute discretion,” one source close to the club told The Weekend Australian.

“It’s in their rules that you can’t actually challenge them. It is the NRL parallel universe separate from the rest of the world’s legal functions. That’s what is going on there.

“They’re not used to getting challenged on it. If they want to have a shot about corporate governance, time to clean up your own backyard, isn’t it.”

The NRL yesterday afternoon confirmed the club and officials had requested and been granted 28 days to respond to their breach notices. It is understood the club’s legal team also received the full brief of evidence against the club and its officials yesterday, with the interaction between Greenberg and former Parramatta chief executive Scott Seward set to be closely perused.

“As we said from the outset, this is a preliminary decision and the club now has an opportunity to respond,” an NRL spokesman said. “Once the club’s response is considered, the NRL will make a final determination on the penalty which may be the same or it may change.

“It is important to note that no final decision has been made. The club can accrue points while the breach process is ongoing but the NRL will determine whether those points are retained in its final determination.

“As we have said before, if the club gets under the salary cap in the meantime that will be a material consideration.”

The NRL had cancelled a meeting between club officials and salary cap auditor Jamie L’oste Brown on Thursday but talks are set to continue over the weekend in written form as the NRL considers Parramatta submissions on their cap position.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...eAustralianSportsNews (The Australian | Sport)
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,170
BTW I heard Jimmy Smith on the radio last night. Some merkin called up and complained that Storm were unable to play for points yet the Eels can. JS pointed out that Storm were $1M over the cap with its current roster when the cap was only $4M. The Eels he said, are $570k over in a $7M cap and it appears that the $570k is an accumulation of past years TPAs which, he hears, some may have been double dipped.

Thanks for keeping it real Jimmy.
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,559
Who's going to employ Seward now? Who is he working for now?

I guess hes guaranteed for life a job with Greenberg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top