Yes, this is what I've been saying for 2 days. By all means accept the findings with respect to which we are guilty immediately. But at least read the breach notice carefully and if there are cases where we think the NRL has got it wrong we respond appropriately. It doesn't excuse any 'illegal' behaviour that did happen, but it potentially reduces the extent to which we were/are over the cap, and the extent to which we would need to re-organise to get under this year's cap.
Agree with this
If it is the case that the NRL have included all our TPA's in the breach list, I think it highly unlikely such a claim would withstand scrutiny.
As I see it, the NRL has had it's investigation and reached a conclusion, and for some that is enough to say we are guilty as charged . This is akin to the police investigating a crime, coming up with a suspect, and assuming that suspect is guilty as charged, without the due process of a trial. If the club / board are of the belief we have not transgressed in the manner the NRL claims, whatever evidence the NRL has, and I'm sure there's plenty, needs to be tested.
We have seen numerous examples of such in the press over the last months, the standout being the allegations regards Semi, the press had their evidence, yet it withstood no more than a cursory examination to show it was not what was claimed.
If the board or members of the board were to step aside immediately as many are demanding, we would in my opinion, lose a hell of a lot of our ability to test the claims made against us. For that reason alone, if the club genuinely believes we have a case to defend some of these findings, they should stand firm.
Without any detail, it's difficult to know. But I think most here would agree the club is entitled to a fair process of challenging the findings and sanctions made against it, and by extension, that must also include the findings and sanctions made against individual officers or employees of the club.