yy_cheng
Coach
- Messages
- 18,734
Just had a quick check, pretty much only storm / sharks / dogs / roosters aren't carrying a player on their bench this week that can play hooker. A couple carry a utility that can cover hooker.
SO 75% do
Just had a quick check, pretty much only storm / sharks / dogs / roosters aren't carrying a player on their bench this week that can play hooker. A couple carry a utility that can cover hooker.
According to the Parra site
Date of Birth:05-05-1994
Height:175 cm
Weight:90 kg
Position:Hooker
Rep. Honours:Under 20s NSW Blues (2014)
Junior Clubs:Cabramatta
FG Debutarramatta Eels v North Queensland Cowboys - 4 May 2013
Club Debutarramatta Eels v North Queensland Cowboys - 4 May 2013
Jake Granville is smaller
Date of Birth:07-02-1989
Height:172
Weight:85
Position:Hooker
Pritchard is too small to be a first string hooker in the modern game. His durability issues show that. Don't get me wrong, I like the kid, he certainly plays above his weight but that's part of the problem. You just can't have a 75kg hooker in the modern game IMO.
Reckon Kaysa + IDG would be roughly same amount as Peats by himself. I reckon this has worked out better for Peats as well, especially if he can really bump up his market value by end of next season.Not even for $300k a year?
I would've though it all depends on what he was asking for.
It will be interesting to find out what are BA's plans for our hooking position next year.
That was his birth weightStats I saw said 75kg. Maybe an outdated profile, but 90kg has him bigger than Peats, McCullough, Luke, Ennis....he's noticeably smaller than them so I'd be shocked if he's 90!
That makes sense. bringing on a fresh hooker can help us up the pace mid game as well, forcing the other team to up their pace to keep up, which can lead to an attacking advantage..
I've always felt before that having 2 hookers was a waste of a bench space, but I guess it has its merits..
That was his birth weight
Reckon Kaysa + IDG would be roughly same amount as Peats by himself. I reckon this has worked out better for Peats as well, especially if he can really bump up his market value by end of next season.
well the site is obviously wrong. If Bazal says he's 75kg, then he's 75kg. That why they call him the human scale you know.. ;-)
Stats I saw said 75kg. Maybe an outdated profile, but 90kg has him bigger than Peats, McCullough, Luke, Ennis....he's noticeably smaller than them so I'd be shocked if he's 90!
Well shit, I hope he buys his mum flowers every mothers day
My bad, I must have got outdated profile info from NYC.
Weight aside, I stand by his size being on the small side. He's not bigger than Peatsy.
Unders enough to match what IDG may be asking for? If so, he'd probably be selling himself way shortI think he would've taken unders to stay with us by the way he was talking.
He's relatively lean up top but he does have tree trunks for legs. Plus a fairly sizable nogginMy bad, I must have got outdated profile info from NYC.
Weight aside, I stand by his size being on the small side. He's not bigger than Peatsy.
Stats I saw said 75kg. Maybe an outdated profile, but 90kg has him bigger than Peats, McCullough, Luke, Ennis....he's noticeably smaller than them so I'd be shocked if he's 90!
Well shit, I hope he buys his mum flowers every mothers day
He's relatively lean up top but he does have tree trunks for legs. Plus a fairly sizable noggin