The approach to the NRL from a high-ranking Wests Tigers representative also raised concerns over rumours of a growing push to revive the Magpies brand at the expense of the Tigers despite a heritage deed prohibiting the club from doing so until at least 2030.
Why till 2030, was there something written in the licence contract that states the wests tigers needed to stay branded for a minimum of 30 yearsThe really interesting takeaway from that article, for mine, was this bit. I wasn’t aware of it before
Balmain need to start talking to Brisbane EastsThe really interesting takeaway from that article, for mine, was this bit. I wasn’t aware of it before
It would be so interesting to see what the merger agreement contains, I wonder if it is as cooked as the Fitzroy/Bears AFL documentWhy till 2030, was there something written in the licence contract that states the wests tigers needed to stay branded for a minimum of 30 years
I'm wondering what the Western Bears one looks like.It would be so interesting to see what the merger agreement contains, I wonder if it is as cooked as the Fitzroy/Bears AFL document
Better have one that lasts a century minimumI'm wondering what the Western Bears one looks like.
I'm wondering what the Western Bears one looks like.
If norths have no seats on the board, then i can see them getting frustrated like balmain are.Better have one that lasts a century minimum