SDM , if that was directed at me, sorry but you have misdirected as usual
Mateo was good to get from up 6 to to a bigger lead, but not worth the cash thrown at him. For the record, I have never believed Robbo was NRL standard, check with Springs and Lingard on that one.
We have all done dumb shit in the heat of the moment when the pressure is on. It was a c**k-up, for sure, and I reckon he would be dirty enough on himself.
The same people who bag Robbo probably clap pea heart Mateo when he misses a tackle and cry that he is no longer with us.
Morts is on at least 3 times more than Robbo, probably more. Morts has had more than enough chances. 50 games in first grade is more than enough chance's to prove his worth. Robbo played only 4 games in 6 yrs at Moanly for a reason. And yet Kearney would still have Robbo ahead of Morts, doesn't say much for Morts does it??now see, right at present, i would much rather defend Morts than i would Robson....wow!?
Robson has been afforded way more opportunities than Morts and at least Morts has youth on in his favour - that's not being harsh, just facing facts
can't really argue about pea-heart Mateo though....he will be one of the greater disappointments (in my eyes) ever as a Parramatta player, all the talent in the world, but just pure lazy at times....hmm, makes me think BS actually had him pegged correctly, which is something i always blamed BS for at the time
What did Witt do wrong though? He was good for us in 04 in an ordinary team, was replaced by the eventual rookie of the year in 2005 and helped Manly get the finals in the same year!
At Warriors he made the finals with them too???
I always got the impression it was an attitude problem more than a skill problem.
I don't want him back but I don't think he deserves to be bagged because the media may have said he would play SOO one day.
Morts is on at least 3 times more than Robbo, probably more.
now see, right at present, i would much rather defend Morts than i would Robson....wow!?
Robson has been afforded way more opportunities than Morts and at least Morts has youth on in his favour - that's not being harsh, just facing facts
now see, right at present, i would much rather defend Morts than i would Robson....wow!?
Robson has been afforded way more opportunities than Morts and at least Morts has youth on in his favour - that's not being harsh, just facing facts
can't really argue about pea-heart Mateo though....he will be one of the greater disappointments (in my eyes) ever as a Parramatta player, all the talent in the world, but just pure lazy at times....hmm, makes me think BS actually had him pegged correctly, which is something i always blamed BS for at the time
The fault lies at Hagan, he let Hodko and Maloney go to pay Funch a kings ransom. Lets face it the guy is on a pie and coke deal and what more can you expect of him???? He is keeping Mr Blue eyed bred in the purple 250k per yr daniel Mortimer at Wenty.I am not trying to defend Robson's performance, he just isn't good enough. I am just saying that the anger being directed at him is unfair. The anger should be at whoever is responsible for him being our first choice halfback.
Why wont anyone just tell Mortimer to f*ck off?...
CUT HIM LOOSE!...
Why wont anyone just tell Mortimer to f*ck off?...
Its simple, he isnt first grade, we gave him a nice college fund, time to cut him loose.
Merrylands Rams trials is early 2012, somebody give him pamphlet.
Its not as if Kearney didnt give him ample opportunity to show him what he is capable of?...
And none of this "well look at the players around him"....they dont affect his pass options, lack of kicking game, lack of putting the ball out on the full, lack of making any dominant tackles, lack of realising that throwing the inside pass 5 times out of 5 wont fool defenses..
CUT HIM LOOSE!...
I hope he makes it back for the final round so that a capacity crowd can see him off and thank him for the memories.