Ennis was woeful in that game. Catching and falling for his two trys does not mean he out-played anything.
Grubbers failing to break the line, looked inept in attack and couldn't get his forwards rolling despite having a full-pack vs the Tigers with a single prop.
Farah hasn't been up to his usual standards, but he still had a very good 40/20 and was at the heart of the very few good things we were able to do. This with only one prop to give him room - our second starting front rower refused to take a hit-up until the 10th minute.
The fact that you can even compare their mid-field performances is ludicrous. Had Wests had the field position and possession of the Dogs it would have been 50 for us and you know Farah would have been key to 90% of it. Ennis offered nothing apart from a kick-down field when we had no fullback and were already heading to the showers.
We like Farah so much, because we'd be a wooden spoon side without him. Look how inept we were when he was moved from the 9 at the weekend. The difference in Melbourne and Canterbury with their hookers gone is hardly noticeable.