Card Shark
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,237
They play very similar styles, surprisingly ;-)
Did the right thing? Well I guess if shitting your pants in public and having all your suitors run away is the right thing
señor, usted es tan gracioso:lol:
Was actually just popping into this thread to make that joke. He was tuurrible today.
Glad to see on channel 9 news that Fifita is suing the Bulldogs for 3.2 million . I say good on him. What the dogs did was an outrage. They played with his families life, and must be fined heavily by the NRL.
What sort of grubby club offers a player the largest contract in their history, only to renege? The bulldogs are a filthy disgraceful and disruptive organisation. Andrew Fifita dodged a massive bullet. He's one lucky boy.
Glad to see on channel 9 news that Fifita is suing the Bulldogs for 3.2 million . I say good on him. What the dogs did was an outrage. They played with his families life, and must be fined heavily by the NRL.
What sort of grubby club offers a player the largest contract in their history, only to renege? The bulldogs are a filthy disgraceful and disruptive organisation. Andrew Fifita dodged a massive bullet. He's one lucky boy.
Fifita is a dipshit much like you.
Seriously get off your parents computer and find yourself a good man
:lol: End yourself.
If I had $3.2 million for every Weidler exclusive that panned out, I'd be broke and living with my mum again. A bit like you.
Dogs breath, you are just a pathetic bandwagon Bullgrub supporter. You will defend your grubby club no matter what. The dogs reneged on his deal moron, wake up and smell the roses, and take off your pathetic grub glasses. Maybe you and your loser mate the drunk, should get together and compare notes. You have so much in common.
But 3rd party deals arent known to the public... so how is the representation obvious to anyone?
Gonzo, what don't you understand, the Bulldogs did not back out of the deal, the SPONSOR who was going to be paying Fifita did, and that's because of the comments he wrote about rugby league and wishing he'd sign with union instead.
Let me ask you something, serious question. If you were going to be paying a player $600,000 a year (let's just say that's what it was considering it?s common knowledge that 850k is known to be b/s), would you want this player representing your company and saying bad things about the code? Yes or no?