Penrose Warrior
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,467
Week 1 v a team that will be in the bottom 3....great performance and guys look fit/sharp but I'll be waiting a few weeks/months until making any sort of summary on where we might be.
Well from the outset of his appointment, he said the process would be three years. This is his third year, he HAS to deliver on his word and so far so good. A grand final is what he meant. He didn't say that but what else could be the aim of the 'process'. I'd cut him some slack if we made it to this years major semi final. Top 8 wont do nothing for Kearney because thats not what he meant when he was talking about his process.
How do you measure the 3 years? As by the start of pre season in November 2019 he has had his 3 years in charge.Well from the outset of his appointment, he said the process would be three years. This is his third year, he HAS to deliver on his word and so far so good. A grand final is what he meant. He didn't say that but what else could be the aim of the 'process'. I'd cut him some slack if we made it to this years major semi final. Top 8 wont do nothing for Kearney because thats not what he meant when he was talking about his process.
Oh ok, I thought you meant finals like top 8. Top 8 is good but its not very ambitious from Kearney if thats what his process was all about. That to me would suck.Agree, that’s why I said “make the finals and go ok”. Which I’d characterise at making the semifinals (week two) minimum, preferably week 3 or the GF.
How do you measure the 3 years? As by the start of pre season in November 2019 he has had his 3 years in charge.
He is at 2 years 4 months.
No this is his third year, at the end that is. We all know what he said/promised. HE said it, NOT me. Lets be clear about that.How do you measure the 3 years? As by the start of pre season in November 2019 he has had his 3 years in charge.
He is at 2 years 4 months.
Yeah but you're saying GF if I read that right.No this is his third year, at the end that is. We all know what he said/promised. HE said it, NOT me. Lets be clear about that.
We can speculate what he means but if the aim of his process was to make the top 8 then thats not very ambitious. Thats not setting the bar high at all. I think if we ask Kearney what the aim of his process was it would be to win the f**kin thing, he'd probably say to me 'oh no doubt thats my aim of my process'.Yeah but you're saying GF if I read that right.
No coach promises a club or its fans a GF.
He wont be counting chickens, he'll be dreaming privately to himself and aiming to make the Warriors the best of sixteen teams, plenty of times that doesnt guarantee a GF, anyone including the Reffs can rob that from u.
After his experience at the Eels I doubt SK will be making promises on positions other than being the best or very close to and hoping on a bit of luck with injury and the bounce of a spheroid ball.
Yeah fair enough. Kearney strikes me as someone with high ambitions for the club, especially considering that he use to bust his ass for us out there on the field.I think what Kearney meant was three years to be genuine contenders. Which to me means week two of the finals at minimum. At that point it’s sudden death and anything can happen so I don’t think trying to guarantee anything more than that is smart. But I think if you asked the Chooks, Storm or Broncos fans what they’d consider a decent season that’s probably about what they’d say. And it’s being able to foot it with that group that is the aim.
Yeah fair enough. Kearney strikes me as someone with high ambitions for the club, especially considering that he use to bust his ass for us out there on the field.
Remember our conversation tonight is all to do with your question. I have not strayed from that and that is - what it would take for Kearney to get that high recognition as a coach. If we conk out on week 2 of the finals, nothing would be made out of Kearney. If we go to a semi or grand final....then you will see what I mean. You will see Kearney get that recognition.
Bellamy is a very ambitious coach.I think that week two exit scenario largely comes down to how it happens. As I mentioned it’s sudden death at that point, we could go out in an epic golden point tussle with the eventual premiers. That would definitely be a pass. Getting soundly beaten out in straight sets, no.
As for Kearney’s standards I think you can infer them from who and where he learned his trade. Bellyache and the Storm are the benchmark.
Yes, agree with it all, but coaches don't drop the ball.Kearney needs to take some responcibility for this loss
Isaac Luke not 100% fit, Tevaga is not a 40-50 minute hooker. Yes he can fill in but hes a ball playing runner now. Went SK took Burr off our middle started missing tackles. Papalii looked under done and couldnt sew up the middle of the ruck. Harris out wide was non affective, actually our fringe runners didnt really provide anything. Lisone, while his hitups are effective and full of enthusiasm is just a penalty machine, easily gets baited and loses concentration. It was a bad day at the office. Fus let in 2 tries and RTS was contained. These things happen occasionally but i think we beat Manly easily this week. im about to jump on facebook and read the 541356587465 posts about how we missed SJ
Buy back the farm.They mentioned during the game that Kata is the longest serving player left at the club- that shows the depth of the cleanout that the club has had in the last few years.
SJ is gone.
We have nobody to replace him...