Edwahu said:Most of the team has looked f**king lazy for the last few weeks. There is no urgency.
Thank god for Weyman, now get Carney and Rothers in the side ASAP so we can start building for next year instead of f**king around with players who are not going to take us anywhere, just because there is a tiny undeserved chance we might fluke something this year.
Just a few comments. The reason we lost this game was down to attitude. There is no way Manly are better than us skill wise. I don't think I've ever seen a team in any sport that consistently loses when they are strong favourites to win. Obviously the players think by turning up they'll win the game. I won't lay the blame squarely at Elliott's feet, these are proffesional (haha) athletes that should be able to motivate themselves without having to be motivated by someone else. In saying that, Elliott should have identified this as a problem earlier in the season. Saying sh*t after the game about how the preparation wasn't ideal, well Matty, if the preparation wasn't ideal you're not doing your f*cking job. The fact you identify this repeatedly yet the same problem still emerges is greatly concerning.
Raider_69 said:3 years in coaching
2 premierships and 1 runner up
speaks for itself
- Dear oh dear, I think that's way way off. For one, Mogg is nowhere near McLinden or Preston in attack. Two, his defence is his strong point! Today he might have been off, but normally he's just about impossible to get past.Mogg. If I hear one more person go on about how good he is, this, that and the others I will go insane. He is now in the same catergory as McLinden and Preston Campbell where he does a few good things with the footy but his defence is so disgraceful that people forget this side of his game.
Wayyyy out of my league!!!concomitants
I wasn't saying that Mogg is as good in attack as the other two. The point is that those other 2 players cost their team tries every week, usually more than they score or create. If Mogg's defence is his strong point we are all in trouble. He rushes up and in so if it is a good read then he gets the player before they have a chance to do anything. If he misreads it, which is all too common lately - not just today, then he leaves Smithy with 2-3 players running at him. He is dead set costing us a couple of tries a game I reckon. Strong Point? Perhaps getting on the outside of his man with a fend comes to mind.Mogg. If I hear one more person go on about how good he is, this, that and the others I will go insane. He is now in the same catergory as McLinden and Preston Campbell where he does a few good things with the footy but his defence is so disgraceful that people forget this side of his game.
- Dear oh dear, I think that's way way off. For one, Mogg is nowhere near McLinden or Preston in attack. Two, his defence is his strong point! Today he might have been off, but normally he's just about impossible to get past.
woodgers said:Quote:
I wasn't saying that Mogg is as good in attack as the other two. The point is that those other 2 players cost their team tries every week, usually more than they score or create. If Mogg's defence is his strong point we are all in trouble. He rushes up and in so if it is a good read then he gets the player before they have a chance to do anything. If he misreads it, which is all too common lately - not just today, then he leaves Smithy with 2-3 players running at him. He is dead set costing us a couple of tries a game I reckon. Strong Point? Perhaps getting on the outside of his man with a fend comes to mind.Mogg. If I hear one more person go on about how good he is, this, that and the others I will go insane. He is now in the same catergory as McLinden and Preston Campbell where he does a few good things with the footy but his defence is so disgraceful that people forget this side of his game.
- Dear oh dear, I think that's way way off. For one, Mogg is nowhere near McLinden or Preston in attack. Two, his defence is his strong point! Today he might have been off, but normally he's just about impossible to get past.
Raider Ultra said:Just a few comments. The reason we lost this game was down to attitude. There is no way Manly are better than us skill wise. I don't think I've ever seen a team in any sport that consistently loses when they are strong favourites to win. Obviously the players think by turning up they'll win the game. I won't lay the blame squarely at Elliott's feet, these are proffesional (haha) athletes that should be able to motivate themselves without having to be motivated by someone else. In saying that, Elliott should have identified this as a problem earlier in the season. Saying sh*t after the game about how the preparation wasn't ideal, well Matty, if the preparation wasn't ideal you're not doing your f*cking job. The fact you identify this repeatedly yet the same problem still emerges is greatly concerning.