baselinepanther
Bench
- Messages
- 3,224
they aren't , or any on some they own eitherWhy would the Govt spend money on a privately owned Endevour field or whatever they call it now?
they aren't , or any on some they own eitherWhy would the Govt spend money on a privately owned Endevour field or whatever they call it now?
Nobody tell him how much government money shark park has already gotWhy would the Govt spend money on a privately owned Endevour field or whatever they call it now?
NRL set to hold government to ransom as stadium war threatens to spill into courtroom
By Michael Chammas and Lucy Cormack
August 2, 2022 — 6.47pm
The NRL will hold the NSW government to ransom as the ugly fallout from a new phase of the Sydney stadium wars threatens to spill into the courtroom and strip the state of lucrative grand final hosting rights.
Following months of uncertainty over whether a handshake agreement to rebuild a cluster of suburban stadiums would proceed, Premier Dominic Perrottet on Tuesday evening told the NRL he would not commit to a timeframe for investment and would prioritise funding for flood reconstruction.
“I find it appalling that they’re using human tragedy of the floods to renege on an agreement,” the powerful chair of the Australian Rugby League Commission, Peter V’Landys, told the Herald.
The government’s decision triggered an angry confrontation in the premier’s office between Perrottet and V’Landys, who has now devised a strategy that could trigger a legal battle over the future of Stadium Australia at Sydney Olympic Park.
Under a 2018 agreement struck by the then premier Gladys Berejiklian, the NRL grand final would remain in Sydney until 2042 on the proviso the Olympic venue would be reconfigured into a 70,000-seat rectangular stadium at a cost to taxpayers of about $800 million.
The government abandoned the plan during the pandemic and V’Landys claims he had secured a verbal commitment from Berejiklian and also Perrottet for between $250 million and $350 million to instead be spent upgrading stadiums in Cronulla, Manly, Leichhardt and Newcastle.
While there is nothing in writing that will force the government into honouring any suburban ground funding, the NRL believes the original agreement for Sydney Olympic Park still stands.
Sources have told the Herald that the NRL alleges there is a legally binding agreement to invest $800 million into the upgrade of Stadium Australia and will hold the government to the deal despite the code’s preference for money to be redirected into boutique stadiums.
Advertisement
“When you consider the billions of dollars they spent in the recent budget, the amount they need to honour our agreement is insignificant,” V’Landy’s said. “We will press that they honour the original agreement, which will cost the NSW taxpayer more due to the way they have handled this.”
The NRL spent Tuesday exploring its legal options and has one of the country’s most respected barristers, Alan Sullivan QC, at its disposal on the ARL Commission.
In a statement, Perrottet said the government remained committed to upgrading suburban stadiums but natural disasters and the COVID-19 pandemic meant investment should be staged.
“The government has just received the Floods Inquiry Report, which will likely require a significant cost to the taxpayer, and I note right now there are still 1366 people without a home in NSW due to flooding,” he said.
“It should come as no surprise that my top priority is therefore supporting those devastated by the major floods across NSW.”
The NRL’s showpiece event, the grand final, is now in danger of being moved from Sydney to Brisbane as the Queensland government prepares to swoop in and steal the decider.
Asked about the future of the event, V’Landys relied: “Everything is now back on the table. It will be a board decision, not mine.”
Sports Minister Stuart Ayres, who is fighting to remain in cabinet over his involvement in the John Barilaro New York trade job scandal, said it would be “an extraordinary move” for the NRL to take the grand final to Queensland.
“We’ve got to make sure that we make investments that are in the best interests of the people of NSW,” he said. “It just might mean that we have to wait a little bit longer before we can spend additional money on those venues.”
While plans to rebuild suburban stadiums such as Leichhardt and Newcastle have now been put on ice, a $300 million redevelopment of a stadium in Ayres’ seat of Penrith will go ahead.
Wests Tigers chairman Lee Hagipantelis blasted the apparent change of policy.
“The government’s management of its stadia policy from the outset has been amateurish and embarrassing,” Hagipantelis told the Herald.
“I assume if the state government is to backflip on its commitment to fund suburban stadiums, then the $300 million committed to the Penrith stadium can now be better utilised for schools and hospitals?
“It would be outrageous for Penrith to retain its stadium for the obvious political benefit of its local member.”
The June state budget pledged $113 million over the next four years to deliver three new training facilities for male and female rugby league players for the Bulldogs (Belmore), Dragons (University of Wollongong) and Eels (Kellyville Park).
melb hardly has zero traffic , but it is far better organised. Its 2 venues are on main train lines & you can walk from Flinders St station to the MCG in 15 minutes , or take a tram.Centralised stadiums won’t work in Sydney
it’s not Melbourne with zero traffic and ease of access
plus one of the reasons the nswrl was formed was the nswru didn’t want to play games locally.
Shared stadiums will not work in Sydney. You're a fool if you think otherwise.
Fk ur dumb, they'll pack out the old penrith stadium instead, its like the whole argument of rebuilding a new one next door to the old one, means f**k all, as they'll never play 30 mins away at commbank, youre off your head if you think thatNo they won’t get one. They will be given the option to play at Parra stadium if they want. I’ve always said this.
clubs sell games to make $$ usually , The Phins don't strike me as a club who will need to do this , much like their cross town rivals ...
Yep like perth and pngMakes no sense when you only have 12 games, and are already committed to three venues, to add another one! They have a pathways partnership, doesn't mean they are trying to build a fanbase there.
Did you also say that Council owned grounds, Leichardt and Brookvale, would also not get funds?Where are all the delusional Sharks fans gone kept telling them they would not get Taxpayer money for a privately own ground. 130 million yer no haha.
sure ... but it won't be the dolphins taking it , they don't need it.Not a viable option but that mining cash still has a place in the game
They would if people really wanted to go. Still takes an hour to get into MCG, Marvel or AAMI if driving from most suburbs. Melbourne has the same population as Sydney but is more spread out. Yes, our PT is much, much better, but the fans all whinged when the AFL closed all the suburban grounds. It is shame that there are no games at all at the traditional venues, but for the financial good of the game it was the best move they ever made. It took people a few years to get used to, but the end result was a 50% increase in crowds in Melbourne and Adelaide, and all teams now have fans all over the city.Centralised stadiums won’t work in Sydney
it’s not Melbourne with zero traffic and ease of access
plus one of the reasons the nswrl was formed was the nswru didn’t want to play games locally.
Still here now and earlier addressing the decision with dissapointment. You might not be a supporter of the clubs who missed out but this decision is bad in general for all league fans.Where are all the delusional Sharks fans gone kept telling them they would not get Taxpayer money for a privately own ground. 130 million yer no haha.
When Penrith arent a dominant side they get 8-10k crowds. Dont make out like they pack out stadiums all the time.Fk ur dumb, they'll pack out the old penrith stadium instead, its like the whole argument of rebuilding a new one next door to the old one, means f**k all, as they'll never play 30 mins away at commbank, youre off your head if you think that
Still here now and earlier addressing the decision with dissapointment. You might not be a supporter of the clubs who missed out but this decision is bad in general for all league fans.
They would if people really wanted to go. Still takes an hour to get into MCG, Marvel or AAMI if driving from most suburbs. Melbourne has the same population as Sydney but is more spread out. Yes, our PT is much, much better, but the fans all whinged when the AFL closed all the suburban grounds. It is shame that there are no games at all at the traditional venues, but for the financial good of the game it was the best move they ever made. It took people a few years to get used to, but the end result was a 50% increase in crowds in Melbourne and Adelaide, and all teams now have fans all over the city.
You can upgrade the suburban venues over time like what is happening at Manly. Keep the capacities 15K - 18K and play half the games - those v other Sydney clubs at SFS, Homebush (not many) or Parra. After a few years of whinging the crowds will climb and these big games will have 50% higher crowds with roughly half the crowd supporting each team which is how it is in Melbourne. The key to growing crowds is opposition supportersIs it that bad? Putting money into say Leichhardt is not worth it.
It’s not the right decision but ultimately the nrl is giving up the right to sell the grand final to other cities so it’s up to them (not the state government) how the money should be directedIs it that bad? Putting money into say Leichhardt is not worth it.
sure ... but it won't be the dolphins taking it , they don't need it.
Struggling Sydney clubs maybe