What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Game Future NRL Stadiums part II

TheEroticGamer

Juniors
Messages
1,180
In the future, what about the northern end of the ground?
The club would obviously like that replaced with a stand too but the hill’s gradient and size is much worse on the Southern side so that one will go first if either of them do. Northern would require reworkings of Ransley st, maybe a closing altogether. So it’s more complicated.

But if it all had work done in a dream scenario, 9k east, 7k west, with 14k give or take added up from the ends would bring it to a nice 30k. But if that ever happens we’re some time from that anyway.
 
Messages
14,822
I don't understand the sooking about QSAC. Spending $500m on extending the SE Busway to QSAC is a great idea. It'll help provide easier travel for athletes to QSAC and university students to Griffith Uni. It'll also be good for people who travel to QEII Hospital. That's a lasting legacy that benefits sport, education and health.
 

Vee

First Grade
Messages
5,595
Im still confused why they bid for the games in the first place without having a suitable stadium? Surely they knew they'd have to spend a lot of money creating something suitable?
It was always and only ever a vanity project for Puddleduck.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,605
I don't understand the sooking about QSAC. Spending $500m on extending the SE Busway to QSAC is a great idea. It'll help provide easier travel for athletes to QSAC and university students to Griffith Uni. It'll also be good for people who travel to QEII Hospital. That's a lasting legacy that benefits sport, education and health.
I assume because Atheltics is such a minor sport in Australian culture, and it will only see very minor crowds post Olympics.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,563
The club would obviously like that replaced with a stand too but the hill’s gradient and size is much worse on the Southern side so that one will go first if either of them do. Northern would require reworkings of Ransley st, maybe a closing altogether. So it’s more complicated.

But if it all had work done in a dream scenario, 9k east, 7k west, with 14k give or take added up from the ends would bring it to a nice 30k. But if that ever happens we’re some time from that anyway.
Are we talking Penrith ? If so isn’t it the huge Sydney water main and the cost of relocation
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,854
what is the highest capacity grass arena in the world. Like 360 hill? It would be cool if there was a 50k grass arena.
 

cinders7

Juniors
Messages
61
The QSAC $1.6B option is ridiculous.

Just add that amount the the $1B for Suncorp/Gabba, spend half on each and for $1.3b you can increase Suncorp to 60k, and build a new stand at the west and of the Gabba to fit in an athletics track and push the capacity back over 40k.

Better for everyone.
Why are Vics so invested in the Gabba being rebuilt?
It's not an athletics stadium, it's a cricket ground... Would you host athletics at Lords?

QE2 is our athletics stadium and it has decades of history in hosting athletic events. It's used by hundreds of thousands of people each year for that purpose. Modernising it and then downsizing it will give a home to athletics for decades and will allow Brisbane to host IAAF events in the future. It will be the best athletics stadium in the country once complete.

Lang Park is 'our' stadium, it makes perfect sense to host the Olympic ceremonies there and will add to the history of the cauldron. It's also in actual need of expansion and modernisation, unlike the Gabba.
 

Diesel

Referee
Messages
23,750
No idea what the Gabba crowds are like this year but I don’t think the Lions have won a game after choking in the GF. Anything the Alf get in QLD should be minimal
 

Desert Qlder

First Grade
Messages
9,381
Why are Vics so invested in the Gabba being rebuilt?
It's not an athletics stadium, it's a cricket ground... Would you host athletics at Lords?

QE2 is our athletics stadium and it has decades of history in hosting athletic events. It's used by hundreds of thousands of people each year for that purpose. Modernising it and then downsizing it will give a home to athletics for decades and will allow Brisbane to host IAAF events in the future. It will be the best athletics stadium in the country once complete.

Lang Park is 'our' stadium, it makes perfect sense to host the Olympic ceremonies there and will add to the history of the cauldron. It's also in actual need of expansion and modernisation, unlike the Gabba.
Stadium influence is part of AFL strategy. Advance their own needs at the expense of others. They see the Olympics as a big opportunity.

Witness your Victorian friend here. They will peddle nonsense like ‘the Gabba is falling down’ online in forums like these. Even when it’s newer than Sydney Olympic stadium and Suncorp Stadium.

Beware the bullshit.
 

reanimate

Bench
Messages
3,862
My understanding was, and correct me if Im wrong, that there has always been $7bill committed to Olympic spend. Half Feds and half Qlnd.
Whats being proposed isnt changing that figure, just redistributing it to other areas? Seems from afar they are spending a big chunk of that money on three stadiums; one that has zero large crowd sporting use legacy (QSAC), and two that are not pivotal to the games success and Olympic funds are being diverted to tart up and give a few more years life to (Suncorp and Gabba).
Smacks of politics and vote winning.
QE2 will have a large crowd legacy use post-Olympics, it’ll be where the Lions are forced to play when the Gabba falls down because the AFL didn’t get their way and get either the new Victoria Park stadium or a Gabba rebuild over the line.

Or so we’re led to believe. The Gabba will magically be fine and the Lions will still be playing out if it post the ‘end of useful life’ figure that’s been thrown around.
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
6,620
I don't understand the sooking about QSAC. Spending $500m on extending the SE Busway to QSAC is a great idea. It'll help provide easier travel for athletes to QSAC and university students to Griffith Uni. It'll also be good for people who travel to QEII Hospital. That's a lasting legacy that benefits sport, education and health.
The sooking only makes sense when you understand that fumblers just want stadiums to benefit themselves. They don't give a f**k about any other sport (including cricket) even in non fumble cities.
 
Last edited:

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,563
Why are Vics so invested in the Gabba being rebuilt?
It's not an athletics stadium, it's a cricket ground... Would you host athletics at Lords?

QE2 is our athletics stadium and it has decades of history in hosting athletic events. It's used by hundreds of thousands of people each year for that purpose. Modernising it and then downsizing it will give a home to athletics for decades and will allow Brisbane to host IAAF events in the future. It will be the best athletics stadium in the country once complete.

Lang Park is 'our' stadium, it makes perfect sense to host the Olympic ceremonies there and will add to the history of the cauldron. It's also in actual need of expansion and modernisation, unlike the Gabba.
Bludge as much tax payer money as they can for their awful sport
 
Messages
14,822
The booking only makes sense when you understand that tumblers just want stadiums to benefit themselves. They don't give a f**k about any other sport (including cricket) even in non fumble cities.
A 60k cricket ground will have Buckley's chance of selling out. It would be the very definition of a white elephant.

I'd like to see QSAC morph into a proper athletics stadium that can host IAAF events. Connecting it to the SE Busway will benefit athletics all over SEQ. Connecting QSAC, Griffith Uni and QEII Hospital to the SE Busway provides a lasting legacy that benefits all Queenslanders who live in southern Brisbane.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,605
f**k the Gabba, it shouldn't get a cent.

Let the AFL pay for its upgrade, they can afford it.

But let's not pretend that QE2 will be anything but a white elephant. It's in a shit location with no transport links.

"Used by hundreds of thousands, every year" - bullshit

And it's legacy mode will be 10k seats.

League fans should be pushing for the Lions share (pun intended) of funding to go to Lang Park, and QE2 be nothing more than a temp setup.
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
6,620
f**k the Gabba, it shouldn't get a cent.

Let the AFL pay for its upgrade, they can afford it.

But let's not pretend that QE2 will be anything but a white elephant. It's in a shit location with no transport links.

"Used by hundreds of thousands, every year" - bullshit

And it's legacy mode will be 10k seats.

League fans should be pushing for the Lions share (pun intended) of funding to go to Lang Park, and QE2 be nothing more than a temp setup.
To be fair QE2 is used weekly for athletics meets so it does get quite a bit of use. I have no problems with our athletic centre getting an upgrade to host the Olympic athletics.

Agree on the Gabba, it is just the AFL sticking its nose in the trough
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
6,620
Stadium influence is part of AFL strategy. Advance their own needs at the expense of others. They see the Olympics as a big opportunity.

Witness your Victorian friend here. They will peddle nonsense like ‘the Gabba is falling down’ online in forums like these. Even when it’s newer than Sydney Olympic stadium and Suncorp Stadium.

Beware the bullshit.
The other tactic is "you'll lose test matches" as if the fumblers care if Brisbane loses test matches. Besides Cricket Australia would be shooting itself in the foot ignoring the third largest city in the country.
 

cinders7

Juniors
Messages
61
f**k the Gabba, it shouldn't get a cent.

Let the AFL pay for its upgrade, they can afford it.

But let's not pretend that QE2 will be anything but a white elephant. It's in a shit location with no transport links.

"Used by hundreds of thousands, every year" - bullshit

And it's legacy mode will be 10k seats.

League fans should be pushing for the Lions share (pun intended) of funding to go to Lang Park, and QE2 be nothing more than a temp setup.
It's literally in the stadium report.
You can dislike a fact, but it won't make it untrue...

Athletics Australia seems wholly supportive of this too.
Currently a hub for hundreds of thousands of athletics participants, from school children to elite athletes, QSAC is in need of redevelopment as a state-of-the-art venue. In doing this for the Games, the sport of athletics will become more accessible than ever, and the venue will provide the option to host more world class and global athletics meets in Australia.

The proposed upgrade of QSAC is not only the best outcome for the athletics community but for Queensland, with the cost of the redevelopment of Queensland's second-most visited stadium substantially lower than other plans so far recommended.
 
Top