MugaB
Coach
- Messages
- 14,998
The new topic donkey want to push onto every thread, no bears in perf.... whatever happened to relocating Canberra to Adelaide or Dragons to Singapore (you know coz Asians luv the Dragon)
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The new topic donkey want to push onto every thread, no bears in perf.... whatever happened to relocating Canberra to Adelaide or Dragons to Singapore (you know coz Asians luv the Dragon)
He really is a dog with a bone whenever he gets a new thought in his head.
Is that the same Cox who designed the prior SFS with 60% plus with no cover, poor facilities for women? The same guy who designed it wasn't into any football code ,and his crap design sure reflected this.
Media Release: New Image shows devastating impact of AFL stadium on Hobart’s waterfront heritage - No New Stadium
Our Place has released a new architectural render showing the devastating impact the Cox designed AFL stadium will have on Hobart’s celebrated urban heritage.nonewstadium.au
You can imagine the brawl this will lead to with greenies and other conservation and heritage minded people. Meanwhile the afl lost their battle to have the COE plonked in the middle of the city and are now demanding it be placed in the middle of Clarence thus killing off our parklands. Building it will cause traffic chaos and it’s very unpopular. Council has been forced by locals into a formal referendum on the matter. Long way to go with this one folks.
Why are you going on about this? It is not a future NRL stadium. It will be oval. It’s happening. Get over it.Media Release: New Image shows devastating impact of AFL stadium on Hobart’s waterfront heritage - No New Stadium
Our Place has released a new architectural render showing the devastating impact the Cox designed AFL stadium will have on Hobart’s celebrated urban heritage.
You can imagine the brawl this will lead to with greenies and other conservation and heritage minded people. Meanwhile the afl lost their battle to have the COE plonked in the middle of the city and are now demanding it be placed in the middle of Clarence thus killing off our parklands. Building it will cause traffic chaos and it’s very unpopular. Council has been forced by locals into a formal referendum on the matter. Long way to go with this one folks.
It’s touted as a future stadium for all codes. Luke marvel . You know the ground you keep crapping on about
AFL through in $1m to accor 25 years ago and that $1m ensured it was rebuilt an oval
Which was a dumb waste of money because they then abandoned playing matches there because it's a shit stadium.
They could probably fit their entire fanbase in a 5k capacity stadium and still have empty seats.
We're spending $1.6b to go back to the future?Media now going with a $2b price tag for QSAC. Early suggestions were the $1.6b would include transport but they’ve added $400m on to cover transport. Also still calling it “the Olympic stadium” and ignoring the fact Suncorp will be used as the “face of the games” and host the ceremonies. Queensland government probably could have given more info by now to squash this sort of speculation though to be fair.
The first image of Brisbane’s planned Olympic stadium – the smallest since Amsterdam 1928 – can now be revealed.
The photocopied image of the Queensland Sports and Athletics Centre, obtained by this masthead through the Right to Information Act, shows a single permanent covered grandstand, with most of the crowd exposed to the elements in uncovered temporary seating.
Unusually for a summer Olympics, Brisbane 2032 will be held in the middle of winter.
An artist’s image of QSAC in Olympics mode, designed by Populous.CREDIT: RTI - QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT
The no-frills QSAC Olympic stadium, designed by architecture firm Populous, would hold just 40,000 spectators and be downsized to 14,000 after the Games. Populous also designed the Suncorp Stadium rebuild in the early 2000s.
QSAC was sensationally chosen as Brisbane’s main Olympic stadium in March, when the planned $2.7 billion rebuild of the Gabba was formally abandoned.
In choosing QSAC, Premier Steven Miles rejected the signature recommendation of the Olympic venues review, which he commissioned, to determine the best site for the main Brisbane 2032 stadium.
That review was led by Graham Quirk, a former Brisbane lord mayor, who recommended a new stadium be built at Victoria Park at an estimated cost of $3.4 billion.
Instead, Miles took Australian Olympic supremo John Coates’ advice and announced QSAC.
The Quirk review estimated the cost of building a mostly temporary Olympic stadium at QSAC at about $1.6 billion, but Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner said at least a further $400 million would be required to provide adequate public transport to the venue, which is a 3.1-kilometre walk from the nearest train station, Banoon.
In answers to a federal inquiry into Brisbane’s preparedness to host the Games, the Queensland government confirmed the $2.7 billion that would have been spent on the Gabba rebuild would instead be spent on QSAC and two other venues.
“The Queensland government provided funding which, prior to the [Quirk-led] Sport Venue Review, was to be the $2.7 billion upgrade to the Gabba, which will now support investments to be made in QSAC, Suncorp Stadium and the Gabba,” the state government told the inquiry.
Business leaders have continued to pressure the Miles government – and the David Crisafulli-led opposition – to reconsider their opposition to the Victoria Park proposal.
Local community groups, meanwhile, remain vehemently opposed to a stadium occupying any part of the expansive inner-city green space.
Following the publication of this story, a Department of State Development and Infrastructure spokesperson said the image was “illustrative only and does not reflect a final reference design for QSAC”.
“The project validation report process, including for QSAC, involves consultation with a range of stakeholders, both internal and external to government, and [is] often supported by briefing material such as presentations, with images to aid discussions,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
As the project progressed, the spokesperson added, more renders would be developed, “with input from Stadiums Queensland, technical advisors, the Brisbane 2032 Organising Committee, and other stakeholders”.
Tuesday’s date marks eight years until Brisbane 2032 is set to begin, the event scheduled to run July 23 to August 8, 2032.
Aided and abetted by the current idiot who is trying to pretend he is somehow new and had nothing to do with any of these decisions.
