Yep. Why not?Shift the athletics to Melbourne or Sydney, save billions.
A new stadium actually extinguishes the chance of a second Brisbane AFL team. You simply can’t go from 36k capacity per fortnight to 120k per fortnight. Increasing supply that dramatically would significantly reduce demand. Instead of the Lions pulling 45k per week in 2033, you would have them with 35k and Brisbane 2 with 10k - 15k. The AFL won’t have that.Why does a new stadium equate to a second fumbleball team in Brisbane?
To me it equates to a cricket stadium that can compete against Sydney, Perth and Adelaide for major events like world cup quarter and semi finals.
Right now Brisbane is behind all those cities.
And Paris will go down as one of the worst. Wouldn't use that in a comparison.Have you read the Olympic Games own charter on the ‘new norm’ to significant reduce the costs and impracticalities of the games that’s just coming into effect with Paris and LA? https://www.olympics.com/ioc/new-norm
‘History’ of the games has caused them to become undesirable to host because of the ridiculous costs such as building multi billion dollar ovals most cities don’t need.
Athletics to Melbourne in July?Shift the athletics to Melbourne or Sydney, save billions.
Completely agree mate. f**k AFL, f**k the Olympics. I'm born and bred in Brisbane and all I care about is how RL benefits from this.On top of all this, it gives the perception that afl is the premier sport in qld as it has the fancy new oval and by 2032 Suncorp will be tired and busted - which is where nrl play
watch all the fumblers crow on about this. They are already going on about how afl is taking over qld. They will love gloating that ‘if nrl is so popular why does afl have a brand new 60k stadium and nrl has a 30 year old 55k stadium’