taipan
Referee
- Messages
- 22,500
I thought they have had 20K to a regular match? One not featuring a local side either. It's a bit shit ragging on a 37K regular season crowd. It's one of the bright spots this year in terms of crowds and one of the best advertisements for the game this year.
For a start I'm not sh*tting on the crowd.I'm simply pointing out it was a unique double header involving clubs like the Storm/Warriors/Souths as an argument for what to expect for a home team is a bit rich.The latter two with big WA followings and people going over from the east.It was also in a unique exciting stadium ,even I would love to attend.To use that as one example as to the support at NIB is a bit rich.
Yes they have had the odd 20,000,just like Sydney clubs which PR wants to flick have had.
In effect what happens, you remove one and gain one, and your fan base remains not that much unchanged.
Sydney has had rationalisation, and crowds have remained flat, grassroots only now starting to recover.I doubt the AFL would rationalise further.
The NRL has had so much instability and negative press, further cuts, unless a club is in real financial trouble would create further animosity.From what I gather, the NRL thinks the same.
There are enough players ,here,NZ,PI,PNG and Aussies in SL England to fill two extra expansion teams.And Perth would be one of them.
And you should know the effect of moving Storm home games from Olympic Park to your new stadium,all seater, cover, the effect it has on crowds, membership and probably grassroots.That's where AFL has it, they all have all seater stadiums ,the nRL ATM does not.