One poor decision on the Sydney metro was not being able to take standard heavy rail carriages. And then ripping up the Epping to Chatswood heavy metro tracks a few years after they were setup. So events like yesterdays storm meant you could not divert trains
One poor decision on the Sydney metro was not being able to take standard heavy rail carriages. And then ripping up the Epping to Chatswood heavy metro tracks a few years after they were setup. So events like yesterdays storm meant you could not divert trains
What a stupid comment. You cannot spend a cent on the structure of Town Hall without completely shutting down the city circle. Its depth and location make it difficult to expand the station shell at all. It's an engineering impossibility.
Oh and those billions of dollars are being spent on the new metro, which includes Pitt Street Station, taking a massive load off Town Hall.
Converting that line has far more advantages than disadvantages.
Firstly the time taken to travel from the NW will be much less on the metro than heavy rail, metro trains can go faster. (As an example, the metro from Bankstown to central will save commuters 1 hour per week)
They’re also more efficient at loading & unloading passengers, meaning you can run them more frequently. 3 doors to a carriage rather than 2, plus you don’t have the convergence of people coming from the lower & upper sections of the trains.
Metro is also quicker to tunnel than for double decker trains.
If they didn’t convert that section of rail they either would’ve had to route the heavy rail from the NW via Strathfield or be faced with the slow, twisting journey between st leaonards & north Sydney. The Strathfield route would’nt have been ideal as that section between Strathfield & the city is already close to capacity. Hence why they’re building the metro west next.
There’s a reason most major cities use metro standard instead of double deckers.
For NSW the main decision was loading times. It takes shorter times to load single deck trains. It is also why the NSW Government justified only providing for 25% of metro passengers to be able to have a set on a metro train. 75% of passenger will have to stand. It makes loading and unloading quicker.
One poor decision on the Sydney metro was not being able to take standard heavy rail carriages. And then ripping up the Epping to Chatswood heavy metro tracks a few years after they were setup. So events like yesterdays storm meant you could not divert trains
And there is also the taking out of the Bankstown line coming up to convert it to the Metro line.
The NSW government just announced a $20M grant to NSW Rugby Union for the design and construction for new facilities for all of their Rugby programs. I now await the upcoming article from Peter Fitzsimons denouncing this waste of Taxpayer's money.
The NWRL had nothing to do with yesterdays downpour.
Where do you divert trains that go through Town Hall? There's no alternative..
If anything the NWRL will free up Town Hall by eventually having it's own line through the city, with three new city stations, actually freeing up space on the Town Hall line.
There would have been be if the Metro track could carry heavy rail trains
There would have been be if the Metro track could carry heavy rail trains
I don't think you understand the benefits of a Metro, and in particular, this Metro.
As per the below map, when the current T3 Bankstown line is converted to Metro, it will free up that line and all the trains that use it from Bankstown, through the city circle, hence reducing congestion at Central and all the city circle lines.
You also appear to have ignored all the other facts presented to you with regards to the benefits of a Metro system, as opposed to the current heavy rail.
To have built the NWRL as a heavy rail line (double deckers) would have been condemning new infrastructure in this city to 20th century technology - old and slow.
Also note in the map the 3 new city centre stations, as well as one at Central (which will be underground and independent of the current platforms) which will further relieve pressure on current city stations.
I'm not sure why you think a little bit of flooding at an80 year old railway station warrants such primitive thinking.
Sell the land for both stadiums and build a single 70k rectangular state of the art stadium smack bang on top of Central Station