So they’re putting in seats first and then add the standing room later?
Originally they were going to transform the area every season, ie install seats for the NRL season. I don’t think that’s really necessary tbh. Some NRL fans might like the standing, and it doesn’t take up prime space for the NRL.
better than suncorp?
yeah nah.
It could be read like that, but it was badly worded.
My understanding is that once approval is received which it states is a formality, the safe standing section will be installed.
It will be permanent and will accommodate both the Eels and Wanderers. When the Wanderers are playing, they fold the seats up and lock them into position. When the Eels are playing, they fold them down and lock them into position.
See the pics below.....
Interesting, I could still see some of those seats being damaged by active supporters.
Why do you think that? The majority of damage caused by actives is due to jumping up and down on the seats at old stadiums where the plastic is tired. They won't do that with this system. They won't need to.
Besides it's capacity and laughable location. Yep, just like Suncorp.
Considering how close it is to ANZ stadium it isn't just laughable, it's hysterical.Laughable position? Western Sydney stadium in Paramatta is laughable?
Not if they are both used appropriatelyConsidering how close it is to ANZ stadium it isn't just laughable, it's hysterical.
Considering how close it is to ANZ stadium it isn't just laughable, it's hysterical.
The MCG isn't going to host NRL games and AAMI park isn't going to host AFL games. Same thing in the case with SFS and SCG except the SFS is undergoing the billion dollar sparkly lights installation so the Roosters have no choice.Why? You can pretty much spit between the SCG and the SFS, the same goes for the MCG and AAMI Park.
ANZ and WSS aren’t competing against each other.
Mmmm, ok. The seats are locked into position in safe standing mode. Nobody will be able to fold them down and then climb or stand on them.
Why? You can pretty much spit between the SCG and the SFS, the same goes for the MCG and AAMI Park.
ANZ and WSS aren’t competing against each other.
The MCG isn't going to host NRL games and AAMI park isn't going to host AFL games. Same thing in the case with SFS and SCG except the SFS is undergoing the billion dollar sparkly lights installation so the Roosters have no choice.
If the Parramatta Eels and the Parramatta Wanderers were so desperate to play in a better stadium they surely could have went ten minutes down the road to ANZ stadium. If they were desperate to play in a smaller and more recent stadium, they should have been content with the western sydney stadium not being on the edge of the Sydney cbd and instead actually be in, uh, western sydney? Like 35-40 minutes more west to be accurate.
Ding, ding, ding. Exactly! Which is why I think as a game we’d do better to surrender the $800m ANZ re-development in negotiations in favour of another $350m WSS style stadium at Homebush for the Bulldogs and Rabbits. Vastly improve the fan experience for the 22-24 club games played in the precinct and leave an untouched ANZ for just Grand Finals, Origin and one or two other showcase matches each year. We’d be able to say we’re doing our bit for the tax payer while allowing the next government an out from the mess too. Everyone wins.A major point of bankwest stadium is to provide a better atmosphere for club games, something ANZ can’t do. You could have it right next door to ANZ and it would still have a purpose.