Orange seating like Spotless,it won't sell.
Doesn’t the SFS in its current state fail OH&S guidlines and evacuation standards?
If so isn’t the potential Labour government going to expose themselves to being sued if something did go wrong at the stadium?
You can change standards.
Doesn’t the SFS in its current state fail OH&S guidlines and evacuation standards?
If so isn’t the potential Labour government going to expose themselves to being sued if something did go wrong at the stadium?
Whoever is elected has essentially four options:
1 - Leave a derelict SFS on the edge of the city in an entertainment precinct unused.
2 - Go through with the full whizz-bang rebuild.
3 - Build a more austere club-focused stadium.
4 - Renovate the SFS at a cost somewhere nearing option 2 for the worst result.
I think if the coalition is returned we'll end up with option 3 but I think the ALP would be stupid enough for option 4 and spin it as being the previous governments fault.
If the Coalition is returned, won't they just go ahead with their plan for a complete re-build?
If they’re returned they’re going to be a minority government based on current numbers. They’ll have to trade something away to get it through.
In your experience, do standards/guidelines that are relaxed typically stay that way long term? If changing them is considered both safe and cost effective now, could the same issues condemn the place (even after a costly renovation) 10-15 years down the track?You can change standards.
If they’re returned they’re going to be a minority government based on current numbers. They’ll have to trade something away to get it through.
I don't think the construction is a legislative issue.
Perhaps parliament could pass legislation banning the construction, but I don't think they need any legislation to go ahead with it.
The last time we a labor dominated SCG trust we ended up with the "Pat Hills" grandstand at the SCG...I’d welcome their sacking, but he talks about replacing them. They’ll just be more vested interests, this time Labor supporters.
Better yet we hand the grounds over to Venues NSW.
The last time we a labor dominated SCG trust we ended up with the "Pat Hills" grandstand at the SCG...
In your experience, do standards/guidelines that are relaxed typically stay that way long term? If changing them is considered both safe and cost effective now, could the same issues condemn the place (even after a costly renovation) 10-15 years down the track?
It will link at Westmead, Parramatta and North Strathfield.
Whoever is elected has essentially four options:
1 - Leave a derelict SFS on the edge of the city in an entertainment precinct unused.
2 - Go through with the full whizz-bang rebuild.
3 - Build a more austere club-focused stadium.
4 - Renovate the SFS at a cost somewhere nearing option 2 for the worst result.
I think if the coalition is returned we'll end up with option 3 but I think the ALP would be stupid enough for option 4 and spin it as being the previous governments fault.
Can't SFS be replaced with a Western Sydney Stadium MK2 at a vastly cheaper price than what is proposed, and Homebush properly revamped?
SFS replacement doesn't have to be more than 30k, no?
Yep useless for regional commuters who catch express trains
I lived in the Blue Mountains for a number of years, so yes I have used regional trains.
North Strathfield will interchange with the metro, it wouldn’t surprise me to see that station included on the regional stops because of this.
Some people will need to continue to interchange, very hard to design a new train line to suit everyone. There’s always compromises.
If you build something you have to cater for 15k SCG members as the public cannot sit in those seats. WSS corporate area is too small to house 15k