M2D2
Bench
- Messages
- 4,693
Yes. Yes i have. Just like you have made up your mind by ignoring all the evidence that currently the grounds that are taking the workload of ONE of the stadiums is not looking good, but you want to RISK removing another stadium from that.Look, I'm not going to engage you any further on this because you've made up your mind and I genuinely can't be bothered any longer when the original point as to why they have to be done simultaneously - otherwise the risk that the second one is not done at all, or is done incredibly poorly is too great - remains my original point.
We have very different outlooks on which is the riskier proposition for the game, players & fans.
So far your outlook on the risk is more to do with Government money (am i wrong on this?) and maybe the coffers being empty by the time ANZ comes around if they wait. Its the liberals. They will just sell off more shit and make the taxpayers pay for it.
And at least my view point isnt jumping to "Lets use Belmore" even though we cant, and "Spotless is a top tier stadium". You definitely havent been reading any of the issues the wanderers and the giants have had at that stadium have you, its not top tier, its a shit show. Then claiming Super Rugby is losing a home game next year, when its not to the year after.