Willow
Assistant Moderator
- Messages
- 110,192
I'm telling you it does. The restrictions are attached to your membership.not that I am always logged into, I go into here on the work laptop on incognito mode. Not sure if that affects it
I'm telling you it does. The restrictions are attached to your membership.not that I am always logged into, I go into here on the work laptop on incognito mode. Not sure if that affects it
Their supporters aren't.
I'm telling you it does. The restrictions are attached to your membership.
Please read again what I posted. It's attached to your membership, so you need to turn off any ad blocker on all devices where you have logged into LU.again though other sites get ads. I will have to look at the settings, it isn't intentional my end
Don't take the bait. Waste of time.ROFLMAO. You'd ignore both the Canterbury Bulldogs and Penrith Panthers who are amongst the most affluent of clubs?!
Big whoop. You want to dsicriminate based on supporters financial basis? Talk about blatant stupidity.
You mean the original Western Suburbs territory & Bears territoriesThey could exclude the less desirable clubs/burbs by saying no clubs that are more than 30 minutes from the CBD of their city.
I don’t really see the point of another 12,000 seat stadium in Brisbane.
It’s too small for NRL, too big for Q-Cup.
There already is one in Hindmarsh in Adelaide United's home ground in Coopers Stadium.The AFL will make sure that a rectangular SA won't happen - I suggest that is one reason they have started playing matches there again.
Plus, like the 2022 bid, any future WC bid will have the final at the MCG, which will be partly rebuilt by then with a capacity of 105K (new southern stand) plus 5k drop in seats (like Optus) to make it quasi rectangular. 110K will be hard for FIFA to resist - would be the biggest crowd since 1968 I think.
Possibly, I wonder how much non-football related traffic goes through the current leagues club? I'd imagine for some it's just a place to have a drink, a feed and to hand over some money to the pokies without really caring about which club the place is attached to.I wonder if they'll keep the Leagues Club on Wondall Rd and set up another one at Kitchener Park?
Yeah good points and I'll reluctantly admit I grew up in Wynnum and you're right, it hasn't changed much over the decades.The area needs something. Not everybody wants to go into town. It's not like it won't host musical festivals and the like. And if you have been to Wynumn, it's aging and it's best days were like the 70s. Something like this can be the catalyst to getting the area moving in the right direction.
I've said it many times before and I'll say it again the Swans success was due to on field success from 96 onwards, the Super League war and the demise of clubs like Balmain & Norths etc.So how do you explain the success of the Brisbane Lions and Sydney Swans?
If what you're saying is true, then they would draw no more than 5k to 10k people to their home games, yeah?
Lions draw more than the Bears ever did.
It makes a mockery of everything you said, doesn't it?
Swans are also the largest club in Sydney. Bigger than any RL club in Sydney.
So what evidence do you have that no one in Adelaide or Perth will support a couple of relocated RL clubs from Sydney?
Do you have any evidence, or is it just a biased and narrow-minded opinion that you're presenting as fact?
Pretty sure the Rams died as the league knew it can't compete with the AFL down here.That's just your opinion and there's no evidence to support it. You're entitled to your opinion, but you cannot present it as an undeniable truth that must be blindly accepted.
Brisbane Bears were a new club and struggled. They merged with Fitzroy and have been far more successful. Their example makes a mockery of your claim.
Neither the Rams nor Reds failed. They drew more fans through the gate than some Sydney clubs. Arthurson, Quayle and News Ltd were responsible for The Reds' axing. Adelaide was a sacrifice to appease lowbrow hicks from struggling Sydney clubs who didn't want to accept reality.
Pretty much the same as nearly all LC's then? Hence why they have 30k plus members and the NRL clubs have 15k.Possibly, I wonder how much non-football related traffic goes through the current leagues club? I'd imagine for some it's just a place to have a drink, a feed and to hand over some money to the pokies without really caring about which club the place is attached to.
A lot of people go in there to buy grog, bread, milk and have a spin on the pokies. Having a second one at Kitchener Park would be good for business.Possibly, I wonder how much non-football related traffic goes through the current leagues club? I'd imagine for some it's just a place to have a drink, a feed and to hand over some money to the pokies without really caring about which club the place is attached to.
Cronulla is getting its arse kicked by the Sydney Swans.Pretty sure the Rams died as the league knew it can't compete with the AFL down here.
The Crows had gone back to back the year the Rams died and Port entered the top league the year before too.
If Adelaide United and the 36ers can't compete with the Crows and Power how do you think RL will?
I hear talk all the time about bum sniffers from people here when I say I'm a league fan.
Are you and that soccer troll on Youtube one and the same?Cronulla is getting its arse kicked by the Sydney Swans.
Attendances over recent seasons.
Cronulla Less tham 13k
Swans More than 31k
AFL Tables - Sydney - Crowds
afltables.com
How can we have a team in Cronulla when its attendances are just over a third of what the Swans get?
The Rams drew more than 15k through the gates in 1997 and their all time average is higher than Cronulla's by 800.
Yeah good points and I'll reluctantly admit I grew up in Wynnum and you're right, it hasn't changed much over the decades.