What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Future NRL Stadiums

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
And you'll notice that the Raiders and the other leagues clubs openly opposing him did f##k all to threaten his or Labours position.




.

hahaha

the Raiders set up how to vote cards designed to get the Liberals up including minimising preferences
how the F in hell is that doing F all ???
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
hahaha

the Raiders set up how to vote cards designed to get the Liberals up including minimising preferences
how the F in hell is that doing F all ???

Which had exactly zero impact on labours campaign. Barely even scratched the surface.

yep
but no light rail with the other mob
so a stadium much sooner

so we needed them in

Wrong again son.

The Liberals stance is to renovate Bruce Stadium, which is a massive waste of money because it's simply a band-aid and doesn't actually fix any of the problems with Bruce.

And at this point it'd cost more to get rid of the light rail then to see it through, so we're getting light rail whether it's completely inadequate for our need and only services 3% of the population (or whatever percentage it is) or not.
 

johnny plath

Juniors
Messages
402
$20 says the "new offer" will be a multi-purpose stadium that the VFL can use as well. It is a coincidence that GWS would would get us to the magic number 3....
I dont know Canberra... what are the raiders options to tell them GF and play somewhere else? Fuch GWS and VFL
 

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
Which had exactly zero impact on labours campaign. Barely even scratched the surface.



Wrong again son.

The Liberals stance is to renovate Bruce Stadium, which is a massive waste of money because it's simply a band-aid and doesn't actually fix any of the problems with Bruce.

And at this point it'd cost more to get rid of the light rail then to see it through,.

wrong on so many fronts
the compensation bill for the light rail being stopped varies depending on who you believe about 120 Million according to the Liberals , & 300 Million according to those lying twats in the Labor party

the actual bill is north of 1 billion just to complete stage 1 , & about 3 billion by the time its all done which I never think it will be because we'll never be able to afford it.
that compensation bill would have been a huge waste yes , but a lot less then the total bill as you claimed.

Ive never seen anything from the liberals about a reno to bruce ... not a thing !
have you got proof of this ?

& you said the Raiders did F all
not their efforts came to F all

they actively took part in getting rid of Barr
thats not doing F all is it ??
 

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
But but but Raiderdave said we didn't need other teams!


where did I say that you mong halfwit ?

oh thats right
youre that Sheila ball fan who started crying when I bagged the Idea we had to design the stadium around the Oi League so the little shirt lifters didn't get too hot in summer

hahahahaha
 

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
anyway
Id prefer the liberals ... just beacuse it'd mean that fumbleball loving twat Barr is gone
& for that reason alone
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
wrong on so many fronts
the compensation bill for the light rail being stopped varies depending on who you believe about 120 Million according to the Liberals , & 300 Million according to those lying twats in the Labor party

the actual bill is north of 1 billion just to complete stage 1 , & about 3 billion by the time its all done which I never think it will be because we'll never be able to afford it.
that compensation bill would have been a huge waste yes , but a lot less then the total bill as you claimed.

So basically we may as well see it through like I said, otherwise we're going to spend a sh!t ton of money for nothing in return!

Ive never seen anything from the liberals about a reno to bruce ... not a thing !
have you got proof of this ?

This is the only article that I could find at the moment, but there have been others with the Liberals stating this since then.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act...m-under-canberra-liberals-20121010-27cha.html

& you said the Raiders did F all
not their efforts came to F all


they actively took part in getting rid of Barr
thats not doing F all is it ??

This what I actually said-
And you'll notice that the Raiders and the other leagues clubs openly opposing him did f##k all to threaten his or Labours position.

Not that the Raiders never tried to oppose Labour, that their efforts had no effect.
 

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
So basically we may as well see it through like I said, otherwise we're going to spend a sh!t ton of money for nothing in return!



This is the only article that I could find at the moment, but there have been others with the Liberals stating this since then.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act...m-under-canberra-liberals-20121010-27cha.html



This what I actually said-


Not that the Raiders never tried to oppose Labour, that their efforts had no effect.

that article is almost 5 years old
& thats the only reference i could find as well so a long time & at least one leader ago.
It may not be their position now.

& I disagree the Raiders puiblic stance had no effect at all , maybe not in the eventual outcome of the last election , but the Raiders becoming vocal & involved & not sitting back doing nothing will make headlines , headlines Barr doesn't want ...
The Raiders will continue to chip away & good on them too , Ive never seen this attitude from them in the past & it shows they're serious about RL in this region & they will fight for it down here against anyone including Govts who take it for granted.
 

CC_Roosters

First Grade
Messages
5,221
Just an observation but are the Raiders group not quite wealthy? What's stopping them seeking private investment partners from building a stadium perhaps with adjoining retail and apartments similar to the Cronulla arrangement although granted it's a slightly different situation. That way it's not reliant on a hostile government or having x number of tenants.

Don't get the Australian mentality of every stadium belonging to the state or council. Each club should be ultimately aiming to own and run its own facility so it is in charge of its own destiny. St Helens in England are an example of a club who went down the path of investing in its own ground, great example to follow.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
I think we're wealthy, but not $350 million wealthy.

Stadiums are a massive money sink. Without government support it'd send us under.
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
that article is almost 5 years old
& thats the only reference i could find as well so a long time & at least one leader ago.
It may not be their position now.

They've talked about it in other articles about the new stadium since then, those quotes are just harder to find because they are scattered between many articles.
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
Just an observation but are the Raiders group not quite wealthy? What's stopping them seeking private investment partners from building a stadium perhaps with adjoining retail and apartments similar to the Cronulla arrangement although granted it's a slightly different situation. That way it's not reliant on a hostile government or having x number of tenants.

Don't get the Australian mentality of every stadium belonging to the state or council. Each club should be ultimately aiming to own and run its own facility so it is in charge of its own destiny. St Helens in England are an example of a club who went down the path of investing in its own ground, great example to follow.

I don't disagree, but even if we could find the investors we'd probably still need some government funding, and even then we'd still need approval, which is where it'd fall down like the Manuka oval development did.
 

Raiderdave

First Grade
Messages
7,990
They've talked about it in other articles about the new stadium since then, those quotes are just harder to find because they are scattered between many articles.

Just Like Barr
any govt can change its tune on a whim & a change in the way the winds blowing

The local media are giving it to the twat today
& rigtly so asking ..
since when is an A League Team a must for our city's new stadium to be built ??
that has never been discussed .. not once !!

he is a slimy untrustworthy dog
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,866
Maybe with the numerous hands going up for aleague expansion he is just trying to offer some leverage for getting a team? Give us a team and we'll build you a stadium type thing. If Canberra don't get one doesn't mean that two tennants isn't viable, especially if they can use it for events and one off games of soccer etc.

If brumbies go though then doubt its ever likely to happen and maybe the raideRs group would be better buying Bruce stadium for a nominal amount and redeveloping it themselves?
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
If the Raiders were going to own their own stadium they'd be best building it at Northbourne oval, where they were going to build their centre of excellence.
It's in Braddon so it's right in the middle of the city and they already own it.

The only problems I can see is that there isn't enough room to build it as big as they'd like, and that even the cheapest flat pack stadium costs at least a couple hundred million, chuck a roof on top of that and the price would blow out even more.

They'd have to be willing to give up 5 or so thousand seats and probably the roof as well, but it could be done.
 
Top