What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gambhir the merkin's merkin

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,899
Unjust? He deliberately elbowed a player. Last I checked cricket is a non-contact sport. Watson did nothing to justify the elbowing, and was himself penalised for his verbal response to the elbow? Unjust? The only injustice is India constantly holding the ICC to ransom every time one of their players is punished for an indiscretion.
 

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
6,997
typical garbage from malcolm conn. surely one of the worst cricket journos in australia (and that's saying something!)

murali vijay will play and gambhir will sit out, as unjust as his penalty is

I'm interested to hear why you think Gambhir's penalty is unjust. Given that he has comitted the same offence before, and the match fee reduction penalty he received then obviously hasn't deterred him from re-offending, a suspension seems quite just. There is also the fact that Gambhir pleaded guilty to this last offence.
 
Last edited:

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
if they play him we can't win as the ICC will call it an unofficial test

http://www.thetimes.co.za/Sport/Article.aspx?id=878439

Ponting frets about Gambhir
Sports Staff and Sapa-AFP Published:Nov 05, 2008


The player’s ban could backfire


RICKY Ponting is worried about a potentially explosive incident before the start of the final cricket Test today.

But the Australian captain’s counterpart, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, is “almost sure” it won’t happen.

The reason for Ponting’s concern is the ban on Indian batsman Gautam Gambhir, who was found guilty on Tuesday of elbowing Aussie allrounder Shane Watson in the last Test.

Match referee Chris Broad suspended Gambhir for the match starting in Nagpur today, but the Indians were hoping the opener’s appeal would be postponed.

However, the International Cricket Council produced South African judge Albie Sachs to hear the appeal, which was upheld. Under ICC regulations, the appeal verdict is final and cannot be questioned by a player or his board.

The Indian board issued a statement afterwards, criticising the judgment. Ponting is now worried that history could repeat itself.

In November 2001, during a series in South Africa between the Proteas and India, match referee Mike Denness found six Indian players guilty of various offences in a Test played in Port Elizabeth. But it was the ban on Virender Sehwag for “over-appealing” that caused the controversy.

The incident precipitated a crisis, with India refusing to accept Denness’s ruling and threatening to call off the tour.

Denness was replaced as match referee for the next Test and, when Sehwag was included in the Indian team, the ICC declared the game “unofficial”. Denness was locked out of the Centurion Park ground for the Test, the third in the series, which South Africa won 1-0.

A similar situation could develop today, if the Indians again defy the ICC by fielding Gambhir. If the final match in the four-Test series is also declared “unofficial”, the Indians would win the series 1-0.

But Dhoni, who has succeeded Anil Kumble to the captaincy, said he was “almost sure” the banned opening batsman would not play.

The Indian board has, so far, refused to accept the ruling on Gambhir and called Sachs’s decision into question.

“The said order has been passed without affording the player an opportunity of personal hearing, legal representation and without acceding to his request for certain documents/recordings to be given to him and also denying him an extension of time,” said the secretary of the board .

But the board has named opening batsman Murali Vijay as an addition to the squad for the fourth Test, presumably as cover for Gambhir.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
66,285
He wont play,

if they were adamant he will play then why the need to bring in Vijay?

But if he does play, and the test is deemed unofficial, then why play the game at all?
 
Messages
33,280
if we refuse to play the unofficial test then that's a forfeit against us is it? ...

so we're f**ked either way and the bastards again do what they please
 

Latest posts

Top