What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

News George Williams quits Raiders

Munky

Coach
Messages
11,971
The Raiders should have put a clause in his contract about repaying the transfer fee if he left during the term.

My first full time job had an eighteen month clause following the passing date for course fees paid by the firm. Surely a player not fulfilling a contract is a foreseeable event and can be anticipated from a contractual point of view.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,367
The Raiders should have put a clause in his contract about repaying the transfer fee if he left during the term.

My first full time job had an eighteen month clause following the passing date for course fees paid by the firm. Surely a player not fulfilling a contract is a foreseeable event and can be anticipated from a contractual point of view.
They'd never agree to that sort of deal.

I want to state this as clearly as i can... no one should give a f**k about the transfer fee.
The transfer fee doesn't come out of the cap, paying it back wouldn't go on the cap.
That was paid in order to get the players contract broken, the club can afford it because like most RL clubs, it rakes money in through the scourge of poker machines.
The transfer fee isn't a big deal
 

martielang

Bench
Messages
3,484
I don't think NRL360 are the be all and end all of truth, but I find it amusing how quickly people believe every word a player says (eg. Williams or Bateman last year) especially when they write a sarcastic post on twitter, yet discredit everything Hooper, Kent & Co. say. In the case of Bateman (& likely Williams), Hooper was spot on.
 

big hit!

Bench
Messages
3,452
I've got no bias either way on this..

But the situation would not be how it is if the player - who signed a 7-figure, 3 year contract - requested to get out of it.

It all starts with him. And finishes with him.

Both Gareth Widdop & George Williams are English players who cited "homesickness" as a reason to their clubs in order return home. But that's where the similarities end for me.

The difference between this case and Widdop as I see it is that Widdop had spent a long time in Australia, and served his employer/club (the Dragons) for many seasons and added value to that team. They were better for him being there. The release, while not ideal for the Dragons, was still respectful and mutual - because of how he'd served the club.

Williams spent one season here, then wanted a release. End of season or otherwise.. One season.... A guy who the Raiders had spent transfer fees on ($200k or so??), committed to 7 figures over 3 years, with a competitive squad around him which had reached the grand final only a year before...

The team has declined since he's come to the Raiders. They are performing worse each season since he's been there. That's not all on him but for a guy who signed for a princely sum to want to quit after only 1 season says far more about him than the Raiders club.

Bring back Sezer! The Turkish connection hasn't caused them any issues!!
 

myrrh ken

First Grade
Messages
9,817
5b3e8d.jpg
 
Messages
25
So the NRL bangs on about “mental health”
etc etc etc... and then when a player wrestled with a really hard situation, pregnant missus 10’s of thousands of miles from home and family, says he needs a few days of work ‘cos he’s got his priorities stress, and a club cancels his contract that day & talks shit to the media?

We’re supposed to be down with that? :flushed:
 

Mr. Shaman

First Grade
Messages
8,138
So the NRL bangs on about “mental health”
etc etc etc... and then when a player wrestled with a really hard situation, pregnant missus 10’s of thousands of miles from home and family, says he needs a few days of work ‘cos he’s got his priorities stress, and a club cancels his contract that day & talks shit to the media?

We’re supposed to be down with that? :flushed:

NRL does not give a f**k about player welfare.
 

SBD82

Coach
Messages
17,825
I've got no bias either way on this..

But the situation would not be how it is if the player - who signed a 7-figure, 3 year contract - requested to get out of it.

It all starts with him. And finishes with him.

Both Gareth Widdop & George Williams are English players who cited "homesickness" as a reason to their clubs in order return home. But that's where the similarities end for me.

The difference between this case and Widdop as I see it is that Widdop had spent a long time in Australia, and served his employer/club (the Dragons) for many seasons and added value to that team. They were better for him being there. The release, while not ideal for the Dragons, was still respectful and mutual - because of how he'd served the club.

Williams spent one season here, then wanted a release. End of season or otherwise.. One season.... A guy who the Raiders had spent transfer fees on ($200k or so??), committed to 7 figures over 3 years, with a competitive squad around him which had reached the grand final only a year before...

The team has declined since he's come to the Raiders. They are performing worse each season since he's been there. That's not all on him but for a guy who signed for a princely sum to want to quit after only 1 season says far more about him than the Raiders club.
I don’t see how the Williams and Widdop situations are comparable.

Widdop moved to Oz as a teenager, played junior league here, went to school, and established a family.

When he went to super league it wasn’t a return. I repeatedly saw him say that he wanted to play there someday and play in front of family. I never saw him claim homesickness (happy to be proven wrong but I believe that only came from others). His release was negotiated with the club after years of service. There was speculation that he was sick of Mary (understandably) but they didn’t air their dirty laundry so we’ll probably never know.

Williams on the other hand came with inherent risk of breaking his contract early. Canberra may have thought that they could mitigate that risk but couldn’t have foreseen the impact of COVID. Pretty difficult to keep a player when he wants to go home during a global pandemic. But it’s amateurish the way the Raiders have dealt with it. Sticky has come out of this looking like a petulant dickhead. And he needs to stop leaking shit to his parasite mates in the Murdoch press.

They were gonna lose Williams regardless. But if I was a player watching the way the Raiders have dealt with this there’d be zero chance I’d ever sign with them.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,101
I reckon Hoops was on the phone to Ricky to get material for his retort about 1 minute after that NRL360 ended.

How funny is Rickys "you guys will write what you're gunna write" and "I dont care what people think of me" but then he leaks shit to his media mates to defend himself and the club.
 

GAZF

First Grade
Messages
8,746
So the NRL bangs on about “mental health”
etc etc etc... and then when a player wrestled with a really hard situation, pregnant missus 10’s of thousands of miles from home and family, says he needs a few days of work ‘cos he’s got his priorities stress, and a club cancels his contract that day & talks shit to the media?

We’re supposed to be down with that? :flushed:
Ten of thousands of miles, not tens. There's no need for exaggerations.
 
Top