I'm not attacking you at all...in all seriousness,Farrer need to improve their Rugby League programme in order to compete.You can't blame St Pats for the scorelne for as far as that game was concerned,they did not field all there A squad I believe.
So I ask you then how you would go about making all schools more competetitive if kids are choosing to go to certain schools.Even if they are not making the A squad?
For one, no specialised Sport High Schools - they have not worked (see my 1st post) and done extreme damage to remaining (majority of) normal state high schools with regard to competitive sport comps & generally non-competitive exercise for their pupils. As said earlier the state system has been able to wash their hands of this educational obligation.
Two, no sport scholarships to any schools (private or public) - open or under the table.
No sports training set up like Keebra Park, schools are educational institiutions; not specialised sport training centres.
Talented young footballers would still by looked after but by their district clubs(re: additional training etc), outside of the school set up and school hours.
Therefore, schools would have some good years in local, district , state and national comps and some not so good years, as in the past - just natural selection, not who can import the most.
Educators (including Mr R and Mr P at St Pats) need to accept this statement: Sport is only an adjunct to education at school level and not an end in itself. Academic performance is an end in itself and is not adjunct but the core of the schooling process.