What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Goalkicking

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Playing dumb eh?
Lets look back shall we
madunit said:
I don't think you being realistic.

If the opponents score all their tries under the posts, and we score all ours out wide, then it's going to make a huge difference in the conversion difficulty. And I think you'll find that this is usually the case with the Tigers. Because the defence in the middle is thin and not very effective, I wouldn't be surprised if we let in more tries than nearly any other side through the middle.

And because our best attackers in the backs are out wide, we're going to be scoring more tries out wide.

This is the problem we face by not having offensively skilled players in the forwards and poor defensive players in the halves and backs. All the attacking flair is out wide and all the poor defenders go out wide, leaving big holes in the middle.
I didn't state anything as fact in this post, I merely expressed my opinion.
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
Playing dumb again huh?
I never mentioned that post you just quotedIts clear you just make things up as you go along
If you agree with someone who says we score all our tries in the corner- as you have done on the previous page - thats stating a fact- and you should be able to show stats on this as they would be available

An opinion is "I like peas", "I like R&B" etc

You state things as fact when its obviously NOT then whinge when people scoff at you

Maybe youre thinking of your Sharkies, easy to confuse two teams im sure
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Playing dumb again huh?

I never mentioned that post you just quoted.
No, you never mention anything, Just vague bullsh*t comments to try and convince yourself you're winning an argument, whether there is one or not.

Its clear you just make things up as you go along.
What did I make up? Opinions aren't fabricated.

If you agree with someone who says we score all our tries in the corner- as you have done on the previous page - thats stating a fact-
Only if they stated it as a fact, If I agree with someone who says "Red is the best colour" it doesn't mean that red is in fact the best colour does it now?

and you should be able to show stats on this as they would be available.
I would if I claimed it to be fact. But I never did. I gave my opinion.

An opinion is "I like peas", "I like R&B" etc.
I'm glad you've grasped the basics.

You state things as fact
What did I state as fact?

when its obviously NOT,
I never said anything was fact to start with

then whinge when people scoff at you.
You are attacking me over petty irrelevant sh*t and accusing me of stating facts when I never did.

Maybe youre thinking of your Sharkies, easy to confuse two teams im sure.
Well I didn't see that coming. That's the most antiquated line in this forum. You consistently pull it out everytime you're under the pressure, as though it makes you a better supporter and commentator on the affairs of the Tigers.

Guess what moron.

It doesn't.
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
LOL...willow wannabe- chopping up posts.

Anyone can do that,watch:

MOTH stated about the fact where the trys were scored: Fact: we scored 92 of em, no opinion about it
moth said:
Our prob is we score our tries out wide and go up in 4s whereas the other side score them under the sticks through our pillows and go up in 6s
No "I think" or ''in my opinion'' that I can see, he sounds pretty clear and sure of himself.

your reply on the fact of the tries we scored:

unit said:
I recall saying something similar a while ago and was told it was not logical or some sh*t.
Again, no "I think" or "imo"


Yet you claim

unit said:
Only if they stated it as a fact, If I agree with someone who says "Red is the best colour" it doesn't mean that red is in fact the best colour does it now?
But MOTHs clearly saying something definite like we score all trys out wide- you agreed. No opinion there. FACT.




unit said:
Well I didn't see that coming. That's the most antiquated line in this forum. You consistently pull it out everytime you're under the pressure, as though it makes you a better supporter and commentator on the affairs of the Tigers.
Where did I say it makes me a better supporter or commentator on the Tigers????
Only YOU think that. Maybe its your subconscious talking to you.

I merely suggested youre possibly confusing your two teams.

unit said:
It doesn't.
Thats the way- op in ion. :clap:

You can keep playing games all you like, Ive had enough of this crap.



In summary:

You agreed with someone with the fact we score all tries out wide, I asked for stats to support you claim and you fart around....that tells me ........

............you just make things up as you go along.

End of.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
MOTH stated about the fact where the trys were scored: Fact: we scored 92 of em, no opinion about it
No "I think" or ''in my opinion'' that I can see, he sounds pretty clear and sure of himself.
I didn't see in his post claiming anything to be fact. And if he did, why aren't you asking him to back up his claim?
your reply on the fact of the tries we scored:
Again, no "I think" or "imo"
saying something similar? Not exactly the words of a solid agreeance on the same comment. And again, nowhere did anyone claim to be stating facts.
But MOTHs clearly saying something definite like we score all trys out wide- you agreed. No opinion there. FACT.
It's his opinion you twit, he's not stating facts. And again, why didn't you ask him to back it up?
Where did I say it makes me a better supporter or commentator on the Tigers????
You accuse me of playing dumb, then pull this sh*t out of your arse. You've been bitching and moaning about me supporting 2 teams ever since the day you found out about it. You use a condescending tone towards me in here all the time (which you never used to do) and you use the same response as a snide attack at me every time we get into an argument. You are clearly stating you feel you are a better supporter than me and my comments mean jack sh*t. Problem for you is, I don't give a sh*t about whether anyone can handle the fact that I support two teams or not. It's very hypocritical for anyone supporting a merged team to be hanging sh*t on people who support two teams. You'll never get a grasp of that though.
You can keep playing games all you like, Ive had enough of this crap
You started this whole argument, I'm glad you're openly calling your argument "crap"

In summary:

You agreed with someone with the fact
What fact? I don't recall any stating facts in this thread?
we score all tries out wide, I asked for stats to support you claim and you fart around
Why didn't you ask MOTH? I'll tell you why, because you think I'm a sh*thouse supporter and have no right to make any comments on the team I have been a passionate fan of since Balmain in 1987 at the old age of 6, purely because I've been a supporter of another team for the same length of time as well. I support two teams, always have, always will, you can't deal with that and that makes you a petty person, and even moreso when you attack me over comments that others have agreed with me on. You haven't had a go at MOTH or requested he back up his opinion either. That should answer an earlier question you posed. Dickhead

...that tells me ........

............you just make things up as you go along.

End of.
and as usual you've made a heap of posts in a thread debating pedantics and never giving your opinion, which tells me....you don't watch or understand the game at all....

End of.
 
Top