mongoose
Coach
- Messages
- 11,817
Do you not see the hypocrisy?
You berate Gosford as being too small, not a new area, not growing and bringing no value to TV rights. Yet you support a team from an area that is all of those things. If the NSWRL followed your advice in 1980s there would be no Raiders.
I've asked before and I will ask again. If you think fans in RL heartland who don't have a team to support are less important than people in Perth and Adelaide, and let's be realistic, they will never watch the game, why aren't you demanding the Raiders become the West Coast Raiders?
After 22 years of unrivalled success, the Storm have only inspired 3,500 people across Victoria to play the game.
Perth Red gloats about the Storm getting 90,000 people across Melbourne to tune in when they played the Broncos on theain channel. What the idiot either does not understand or is leaving out is that is similar to what the Lions average on 7mate in Brissie when you consider that Melbourne has twice as many people.
If you think that is impressive, the Lions and the Suns are the least watched teams of the 34 clubs from the NRL and AFL. Let that sink in.
Is that your definition of growing the game?
Is that what you want from Adelaide and Perth?
What value would a Perth or Adelaide team add to the TV rights? They would be stuck on 9Gem drawing 30,000 or less viewers in their home markets. A team in Gosford would draw far more than that.
The AwFuL would not like it one bit if the NRL put a team in Gosford. It would make it harder to get kids to play fumbleball.
You are probably right. If the NRL started from scratch today Canberra might miss out. But they were added in 1982 when the code wasn't a billion dollar sport and when players were not full-time professionals. It takes 3 hours to get from Sydney to Canberra by bus, you don't need to jump on a plane. By the way If you started from scratch today you would not have 9 Sydney clubs either.