The Dodger
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,065
haha
Would you go sloppy thirds reef?
Seconds even?
Exactly Sam.
Whether they are charged or not, I think they should be punished for making such a stupid choice, and for dragging their club, and the game through the mud.
becaue it is not illegal to film yourself having sex.
Only if you distribute or if the person is underage.
Dave Q will know better as he has the southern hemisphheres bigget library of home porn.
Ask him
Another thing that would make any form of charges impossible if she is on the video saying, yeah, go ahead.
Do you think every NRL player that has sex with a girl should be punished? Or just ones that film it? Or just ones that do it in public toilets?
I just think the dumb merkins should be stood down for being dumb merkins and getting into this situation to begin with.
f*cken why???
The LA lakers used to hire houses & have massive Orgies every 2nd night until gold diggers realised they could cry wolf & make a dollar.
If that wasn't enough incentive to want to be a superstar then nothing is.
It doesn't mattter what they do or where they do it, gold diggers will bring them unstuck.
Do you expect them to sit at home & pray together or something?
FMD thats soft!!!!
On a postive for the Broncos, they were all home before 12 o'clock(yeah i know they que jumped, so what), because nothing good ever happens after 12.
Is there a link or proof to these accusations?The Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW & Federal)
it is an offence punishable by fine or imprisonment to photograph a person to provide sexual arousal or gratification if the person is undressed or engaged in a private act in circumstances where a reasonable person would reasonably expect to be afforded privacy, and he or she has not consented to being filmed.
A private act includes using the toilet, bathing and engaging in sexual activities not ordinarily done in "public".
She consented to oral sex - Fact.
She consented to simultanious sex with two of them - Fact.
She Did not consent to the filming - Fact.
whether she agreed to do the other things does not matter. She did not consent to the filming and under Australian law thats a no no.
An ex-copper mate of mine told me on Sunday that from what he understood, he thought Bird was guilty as. Im not surprised. They think everyone is guilty even when they are found innocent!!