What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hayne~NFL~RU~Tits~Eels~Dad~Jailed~Mistrial~Jailed~Retrial~Jailed~Appeal~Quashed-Sued~Fat Coach

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
the Banal school of law says

1. If the DA rules there is enough evidence for you to charged and you go to trial and are found not guilty then you are innocent

2. If the DA rules there is insufficient evidence for you to be charged you will never be innocent because 12 nuffies ever got to decide whether you were not guilty

lol

f**king flip
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,014
the Banal school of law says

1. If the DA rules there is enough evidence for you to charged and you go to trial and are found not guilty then you are innocent

2. If the DA rules there is insufficient evidence for you to be charged you will never be innocent because 12 nuffies ever got to decide whether you were not guilty

lol

f**king flip

Once again showing your complete and utter lack of understanding of anything that has been said. It's quite hilarious, actually. I didn't say he was guilty or innocent. I said that not having enough evidence to charge him doesn't automatically make him innocent.

If you lack the brain cells to understand that, well that sounds like a personal problem.
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,818
the Banal school of law says

1. If the DA rules there is enough evidence for you to charged and you go to trial and are found not guilty then you are innocent

2. If the DA rules there is insufficient evidence for you to be charged you will never be innocent because 12 nuffies ever got to decide whether you were not guilty

lol

f**king flip
That is actually a very good summary of how public perception works.

Too bad you were being sarcastic.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,866
He cannot be innocent under the 6th amendment because there was never a trial. He also cannot be considered guilty for the same reason.

Isn't he even more innocent than if he was found innocent after a trial?
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,014
Isn't he even more innocent than if he was found innocent after a trial?

That doesn't make any sense. Would you then say he was more guilty if he was found not guilty?

There wasn't enough evidence to mount a case. That's the point. Lack of evidence does not automatically equate to innocence.

Personally I don't think he did shit, but that's just my opinion. The argument was over El Derp incorrectly stating someone thought he wasn't innocent because that poster said that lack of evidence doesn't automatically equate to innocence.
 

Latest posts

Top