But lets say I was comparing them. We'll forget the preseason passing yards stat and look at preseason rushing yards since that is what Hayne is 2nd in. The top 50 (
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...263-s=RUSHING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1) has 4 starters (Lacy in 22nd, Ivory 27th, Murray 35th and Morris 39th). That's it. Of the top 10, Hillman, Gray and Jones are 2nd-3rd string, Taylor is a QB, and Robinson might be 4th string. The rest are 5th or worse, and the rest of the top 20 isn't much better.
So now that we are comparing the same positions, am I now allowed to say that preseason stats are worthless, or do you still think they are indicative of what is going to happen in the regular season?
Being realistic isn't downplaying his achievements. Since when has considering the strength of the opposition been frowned upon like this? So if a full-strength Cowboys team play a trial against a QLD cup side and win by 50, you are telling me that is equal to beating the Roosters full-strength NRL side by 50? Surely talking about how poor the QLD cup side is is just downplaying their achievements so it can't be done according to you?