- Messages
- 100,947
Law? Dramatic much?
My opinion, not law, is that it looks entirely useless to have a mountain of articles (often on very similar topics) posted in separate threads, especially when very few (if any) actually generate any comment or discussion. As I said, 95% or more threads have 0 replies. The only time the post count on any of them passes 10 is when Dragons fans wander in to have a lol@souffs.
If you read my post I actually suggested a better way to generate discussion, which might be to have a handful of threads based on varying subject matters (e.g. Charity news, Player signing/re-signing news, corporate/sponsors, merchandise) then have articles posted in those threads.
But of course it's easier to read the username of the person who posted the reply and react accordingly than actually respond to the content of the post, which was intended as constructive criticism.
My opinion, not law, is that it looks entirely useless to have a mountain of articles (often on very similar topics) posted in separate threads, especially when very few (if any) actually generate any comment or discussion. As I said, 95% or more threads have 0 replies. The only time the post count on any of them passes 10 is when Dragons fans wander in to have a lol@souffs.
If you read my post I actually suggested a better way to generate discussion, which might be to have a handful of threads based on varying subject matters (e.g. Charity news, Player signing/re-signing news, corporate/sponsors, merchandise) then have articles posted in those threads.
But of course it's easier to read the username of the person who posted the reply and react accordingly than actually respond to the content of the post, which was intended as constructive criticism.